1955Report of the State Legislature by the Senate Interim Committee on Licensing Business and Professions (Senate of the State of California, Sacramento, 1955), p. 10.
2.
Ibid. The source does not give the name of the profession cited.
3.
Business and Professional Code, State of California, Article 4, Chapter 6.6, relating to the certification of psychologists.
4.
Public Utilities Commission, State of California, Annual Report: 1960–1961 Fiscal Year (PUC, Sacramento, 1961), p. 16.
5.
Ibid., p. 17.
6.
1955 Report…, loc. cit.
7.
Ibid.
8.
1956 Partial Report of the Legislature by the Senate Interim Committee on Licensing Business and Professions (Senate of the State of California, Sacramento, 1957), p. 9. See also p. 105 for this testimony.
9.
KesselR. A., “Price Discrimination in Medicine,”The Journal of Law and Economics, I (October, 1958), 20–53.
10.
National Opinion Research Center, Opinion News, IX (Sept. 1, 1947).
11.
1955 Report …, op. cit., pp. 132–133. Mr. Gillies was the consultant and executive secretary of the Committee; Dr. Rapaport was Director of the State Department of Mental Hygiene.
12.
In only one case has a group been licensed and then defrocked. Barbers were licensed from 1901 to 1903; this requirement was then suspended until 1927, when the present licensing requirement was instituted.
13.
Several of the present licensing requirements are initiative amendments to the state constitution, including those for chiropractors (1922) and all persons connected with boxing and wrestling (1924).
14.
First Partial Report to the Legislature by the Senate Committee on Licensing Business and Professions (Senate of the State of California, Sacramento, 1954), pp. 44–60.
