LevittT., “Innovative Imitation,”Harvard Business Review (September-October 1966), pp. 119–126.
2.
BlackG., Dialogues With Management on Research and Development, Program of Policy Studies in Science and Technology, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. (Monograph 21, May 1974), p. 7.
3.
Ibid., p. 15.
4.
ZwickyF., “The Morphological Approach to Discovery, Invention, Research and Construction,” in ZwickyF.WilsonA. G. (eds.), New Methods of Thought and Procedure (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967).
5.
DoddsL. F.CrottyF. W., “The New Doctrinal Trend,”Journal of the Patent Office Society (February 1948). Reprinted in Patent Law Revision, Hearings before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, & Copyrights, Part 2 (May 13, 1971), pp. 595–632.
6.
BaldwinW. L.ChildsG. L., “The Fast Second and Rivalry in Research and Development,”The Southern Economic Journal (July 1969), pp. 18–24.
7.
SchererF. M., “Research and Development Research Allocation Under Rivalry,”Quarterly Journal of Economics (August 1967), pp. 359–394; BaldwinW. L.ChildsG. L., “The Fast Second and Rivalry in Research and Development,”Southern Economic Journal (July 1969), pp. 18–24.
8.
FischerW. A., Postwar Japanese Technological Growth and Innovation: A Comparative Review of the Literature, Innovation Information and Analysis Project, Program of Policy Studies in Science and Technology, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 1974.
9.
ChandlerA. D.SalsburyS., Pierre S. DuPont and the Making of the Modern Corporation (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), pp. 381–386.
10.
FriedmanM. N., The Research and Development Factor in Mergers and Acquisitions, prepared for the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1958) pp. 13–14; and MuellerF., “The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying DuPont's Major Product and Process Innovations, 1920 to 1950,” in NelsonR. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 326–339.
11.
BlasbyC. G., Project Paperclip (New York: Atheneum, 1971).
12.
TiltonJ. E., International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute, 1971).
13.
GoldB., “Alternate Strategies for Advancing a Company's Technology,”Research Management, (July 1975), pp. 24–29.
14.
SchiffE., Industrialization Without National Patents (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971), pp. 99–101.
15.
Ibid., pp. 58–67.
16.
HufbauerG. C., Synthetic Materials and the Theory of International Trade (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 88–89.
17.
ChurchR. A., “Nineteenth-Century Clock Technology in Britain, the United States, and Switzerland,”The Economic History Review (November 1975), p. 618.
18.
Wall Street Journal (22 September 1975), p. 13.
19.
Central Advisory Council for Science and Technology, Technological Innovation in Britain (London: HMSO, 1968).
20.
TsurumiY., Technology Transfer and Foreign Trade: The Case of Japan, 1950–1966, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1968.
21.
BlackG., Output Orientation in R&D–A Better Approach?Program of Policy Studies in Science and Technology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, Monograph 22, (May 1974).
22.
Gold, op. cit.
23.
LaytonC., Ten Innovations (London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1972), pp. 80–93.