AckermanR., “How Companies Respond to Social Demands,”Harvard Business Review (July-August 1973), pp. 88–98.
2.
AckermanR.BauerR., Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemma (Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing, 1976).
3.
DavisK.BlomstromR., Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975).
4.
PrestonL. E.PostJ. E., Private Management and Public Policy (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975).
5.
SteinerG., Business and Society, 2nd ed. (New York: Random House, 1975).
6.
VotawD.SethiS. P., The Corporate Dilemma (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974).
7.
MurrayE. A.Jr., “The Response of Commercial Banks to Social Demands,”Proceedings of the 1975 Academy of Management, pp. 342–44.
8.
HinckleyG. P.PostJ. E., “The Performance Context of Corporate Responsibility,” in SethiS. P., ed., The Unstable Ground (Los Angeles: Melville Publishing Co., 1974).
9.
“Polaroid, A Case Study—Why Do Women Organize? What Should Management Do?”Women Power (May 1973).
10.
MorganH. M., “A Look Back: When Three Businesses Responded to the Urban Crisis, What Happened?”Journal of Contemporary Business (Spring 1974), pp. 61–77.
11.
EllsS. C., “How Polaroid Gave Women the Kind of Affirmative Action Program They Wanted,”Management Review (November 1973), pp. 11–15.
