GranovetterMark, “Economic Action and Social Structure: A Theory of Embeddedness,”American Journal of Sociology, 91/3 (November 1985); StinchcombeArthur, “Contracts as Hierarchical Documents,” in StinchcombeA.HeimerC., Organization Theory and Project Management (Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1985), pp. 121–171.
2.
EcclesRobert, The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Theory for Practice (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985).
3.
For an elaboration of this point, see RichardsonG.B., “The Organization of Industry,”Economic Journal, 82 (1972):883–896.
4.
For a thoughful discussion of these developments, see WeitzmanMartin, The Share Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984); WaltonRichard, “From Control to Commitment in the Workplace,”Harvard Business Review, 85/2 (1985):76–84.
5.
PerlmutterHowardHeenanDavid, “Cooperate to Compete Globally,”Harvard Business Review (April/May 1986), p.136.
6.
PerrowCharles, “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations,”American Sociological Review, 32 (1967): 194–208.
7.
EcclesRobert, “The Quasifirm in the Construction Industry,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2 (December 1981):335–357.
8.
CoserLewisKadushinCharlesPowellWalter W., Books: The Culture and Commerce of Publishing (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1982), p. 53.
9.
For a discussion of the friendly competition and collaboration that typify scholarly publishing, see PowellWalter W., Getting Into Print: The Decision Making Process in Scholarly Publishing (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985).
10.
Ibid., pp. 144–157.
11.
SabelCharlesHerrigelGaryKazisRichardDeegRichard, “How to Keep Mature Industries Innovative,”Technology Review, 90/3 (1987):26–35.
12.
Von HippelEric, “Cooperation Between Competing Firms: Informal Know-How Trading,” Working Paper #1759–86, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T., 1986.
13.
The commercial aircraft industry is unusual because of the very active role played by governments in insuring that their countries have a major presence in the industry (for a more detailed discussion of the political aspects of international coalitions, see PorterMichael, Competition in Global Industries [Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1987]). In this case, coalitions and joint ventures are driven more by political factors and pressures for economic nationalism than by organizational reasons.
14.
For empirical evidence, see FriarJohnHorwitchMel, “The Emergence of Technology Strategy: A New Dimension of Strategic Management,”Technology in Society, 7/2–3 (1985): 143–178; TeeceDavid, “Profiting form Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy,”Research Policy, 15/6 (1986):285–305; ZagnoliPatrizia, “Interfirm Agreements as Bilateral Transactions?” paper presented at conference on New Technology and New Intermediaries, Center for European Studies, Stanford, 1987.
15.
MaritiP.SmileyR.H., “Co-operative Agreements and the Organization of Industry,”Journal of Industrial Economics, 31/4 (1983):437–451; Zagnoli, op. cit.
16.
FriarHorwitch, op. cit.
17.
GrahamMargaret, “Corporate Research and Development: The Latest Transformation,”Technology in Society, 7/2–3 (1985): 179–196.
18.
HamiltonWilliam F., “Corporate Strategies for Managing Emerging Technologies,”Technology in Society, 7/2–3 (1985): 197–212; TeeceDavidPisanoGary, “Collaborative Arrangements and Technology Strategy,” paper presented at conference on New Technology and New Intermediaries, Center for European Studies, Stanford, 1987.
19.
DibnerMark D., “Biotechnology in Europe,”Science, 232 (June 13, 1986): 1367–1372.
20.
PorterMichaelFullerM.B., “Coalitions and Global Strategy,” in PorterM., ed., Competition in Global Industries (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1987), pp. 315–344.
21.
PfefferJeffreyBaronJames, “Taking the Workers Back Out: Recent Trends in the Structuring of Employment,” in StawB.CummingsL., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, forthcoming); AbrahamKatherine G., “The Role of Flexible Staffing Arrangements in Short-Term Workforce Adjustment Strategies,” in HartR.A., ed., Employment, Unemployment, and Hours of Work (London: Allen and Unwin, forthcoming); AbrahamKatherine G., “Restructuring the Employment Relationship: The Growth of Market-Mediated Work Arrangements,” paper presented at conference on New Developments in Labor Markets and Human Resource Policies, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T., 1987; MangumGarthMayallDonaldNelsonKristin, “The Temporary Help Industry,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38 (1985):599–611; CareyMaxHazelbackerKim, “Employment Growth in the Temporary Help Industry,”Monthly Labor Review (April 1986), pp. 37–44.
22.
MacneilIan, “Contracts: Adjustment of Long-term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law,”Northwestern University Law Review, 72/6 (1978):854–905.
23.
AbernathyWilliam, The Productivity Dilemma (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).
24.
PorterMichael, Cases in Competitive Strategy (New York, NY: Free Press, 1983).
25.
Stinchcombe, op. cit.
26.
Porter, op. cit. (1983), p. 278.
27.
Abernathy, op. cit.
28.
HelperSusan, “Vertical Relations in the U.S. Auto Industry,” unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Harvard University, 1984.
29.
Ibid.
30.
MariottiSergioCainarcaGian Carlo, “The Evolution of Transaction Governance in the Textile-Clothing Industry,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7 (1986):351–374.
31.
WilkinsonFrank, “Productive Systems,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7 (1983):413–429.
32.
DoreRonald, “Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism,”British Journal of Sociology, 34/4 (December 1983):459–482.
33.
GerlachMichael, “Business Alliances and the Strategy of the Japanese Firm,”California Management Review, 30/1 (Fall 1987).
34.
Richardson, op. cit.; Dore, op. cit.
35.
Sabel, op. cit.
36.
On this point, see LovemanGaryPioreMichaelSengenbergerWerner, “The Evolving Role of Small Business in Industrial Economies,” paper presented at conference on New Developments in Labor Market and Human Resource Policies, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T., 1987.
37.
PioreMichael J.SabelCharles F., The Second Industrial Divide (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1984).
NelsonRichardWinterSidney, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).
41.
HannanFreeman, op. cit.
42.
BlauPeter M., On the Nature of Organizations (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1974).
43.
ChildJohn, “Organizational Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (June 1972): 163–177.
44.
AlchianArmenDemsetzHarold, “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,”American Economic Review, 62/5 (1972):777–795.
45.
WilliamsonOliver E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York, NY: Free Press, 1975).
46.
PorterLymanLawlerEdward, “Properties of Organization Structure in Relation to Job Attitudes and Job Behavior,”Psychological Bulletin, 64/1 (1965):23–51; BergerChrisCummingsL.L., “Organizational Structure, Attitudes, and Behavior,” in StawBarryCummingsL.L., eds., Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979).
47.
HackmanRichardOldhamGreg, Work Redesign (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980).
48.
HannanFreeman, op. cit.
49.
TeecePisano, op. cit.
50.
PorterFuller, op. cit.
51.
PolanyiKarl, The Great Transformation (Boston, MA: Beacon, 1957).
52.
Ouchi, op. cit.
53.
KanekoIkuyoImaiKen-Ichi, “A Network View of the Firm,” paper presented at 1st Hitotsubashi-Stanford conference, 1987.
54.
Granovetter, op. cit.
55.
BorysBryanJemisonDavid B., “Hybrid Organizations as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical and Practical Issues in Organizational Combinations,” unpublished paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford, 1987.