For an economic perspective on the importance of organization, see ColeA.H., “The Entrepreneur: Introductory Remarks,”American Economic Review, 58 (May 1968):61–62; and ArrowK.J., Essays in the Theory of Risk Planning (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1971), p. 224. For a comprehensive account of the ecological perspective, see HannanM.FreemanJ., “The Population Ecology of Organizations,”American Journal of Sociology, 82/5 (1977):929–964. On the historical evolution of the business enterprise, see ChandlerA.D.DaemsH., eds., Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980).
2.
ChandlerA.D., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962).
3.
BurgelmanR. A., “Applying the Methodology of Grounded Theorizing in Strategic Management: A Summary of Recent Findings and Their Implications,” in LambR.ShrivastavaP., Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 3 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985), pp. 83–99.
4.
MintzbergH., “An Emerging Strategy of Direct Research,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (December 1979):582–589.
5.
See HeideggerM., The Question Concerning Technology, translated by LovittWilliam (New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1977); and ShermanP.M., Strategic Planning for Technology Industries (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981).
6.
See KotkinJ.GrabowiczP., California, Inc. (New York, NY: Rawson Wade Publishers, 1982).
7.
These are consistent with the findings of other studies. See MaidiqueM.A.HayesR.H., “The Art of High Technology Management,”Sloan Management Review (Winter 1984), pp. 17–29.
8.
MintzbergH., Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983), pp. 137–138.
9.
BurgelmanR.A.SaylesL.R., Inside Corporate Innovation (New York, NY: The Free Press, 1986).
10.
On structural inertia, see HannanM.FreemanJ., “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change,”American Sociological Review, 49 (1984): 149–164.
11.
For an assessment of the impact of new technologies on organizational structures, see ChildJ., “New Technology and Developments in Management Organization,”Omega, 12/3 (1984):211–223.
12.
These terms are derived from Mintzberg's categorization scheme. See Mintzberg, op. cit., (1983).
13.
For different forms of hybrid structure, see HaxA.C.MajlufN.S., “Organizational Design: A Survey and an Approach,”Operations Research, 29/3 (May/June 1981):417–447.
14.
See OuchiW.G., “Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 25/1 (March 1980): 129–141; and BurnsT.StalkerG.M., The Management of Innovation (London: Tavistock Publication, 1961).
15.
KrepsD.M., “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory,” unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1984.
16.
These terms are derived from Leavitt's 3-part model of the managing process. See LeavittH.J., Corporate Pathfinders (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1986).