For example, see MillsD. Quinn, “Reforming the U.S. System of Collective Bargaining,”Monthly Labor Review (March 1983), pp. 18–22; WebberAlan M.DyerDavis, “Auto Talks—Dance Macabre,”New York Times, September 13, 1984, p. A23.
2.
FulmerWilliam E., “Labor–Management Relations in the 80s: Revolution or Evolution?”Business Horizons, vol. 27, no. 1 (January/February, 1984): 26–31; StraussGeorge, “Industrial Relations: Times of Change,”Industrial Relations, vol. 23, no. 1 (Winter 1984): 8–9; KochanThomas A.PioreMichael J., “Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 473 (May 1984): 177–189.
3.
LevitanSarJohnsonClifford M., “Labor and Management: The Illusion of Cooperative,”Harvard Business Review (September/October, 1983), pp. 8–11, 16; CraftJames A., “Post–Recession Bargaining: Mutualism or Adversarial Relations?”Labor Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 7 (July 1983): 431–439.
4.
Two recent major reviews of cooperative programs are KochanThomas A.KatzHarry C.MowerNancy R., Worker Participation and American Unions: Threat or Opportunity? (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn, 1984); SchusterMichael E., Union Management Cooperation: Structure, Process, Impact (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn, 1984).
5.
For example, see “The Future of Industrial Relations: A Conference Report,”Industrial Relations, vol. 22, no. 1 (Winter 1983): 128–129; StraussGeorge, “Quality of Worklife and Participation as Bargaining Issues,” in JurisHerveyRoomkinMyron, eds., The Shrinking Perimeter (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1980), pp. 121–149; BlairJohn D.WhiteheadCarleton J., “Can Quality Circles Survive in the United States?”Business Horizons, vol. 27, no. 1–3 (May/June 1984): 17–23; Craft, op. cit., pp. 436–438.
6.
The analysis of the questionnaire responses is found in ChaisonGary N.PlovnickMark S., “How Concessions and Cooperation Affect Labor–Management Relations,”Personnel, vol. 61, no. 6 (November/December 1984): 57–59; PlovnickMark S.ChaisonGary N., “An Analysis of Concession Bargaining and Labor–Management Cooperation,”Academy of Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 3 (September 1985): 697–704; PlovnickMark S.ChaisonGary N., “A Model of Concession Bargaining and Labor–Management Cooperation,” Clark University Graduate School of Management Working Paper no. 84–102.
7.
MillsD. Quinn, “When Employees Make Concessions,”Harvard Business Review (May/April, 1983), pp. 103–113; Fulmer, op. cit., pp. 27–28; FreedmanAudrey, “Major Changes in Employee Relations,” in EdelmanRichard, ed., Proceedings of the New York University Thirty–Seventh Annual National Conference on Labor (New York, NY: NYU, 1984), pp. 1.1–1.16.
8.
CappelliPeter, “Union Gains Under Concession Bargaining,”Proceedings of the Thirty–Sixth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association (Madison, WI: IRRA, 1984), pp. 297–305.
9.
Dual channels in industrial relations are discussed in BrettJeanne M., “Behavioral Research on Unions and Union–Management Relations,” in StawB.M.CummingsL.L., eds., Research in Organization Behavior, vol. 2 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1980), pp. 220–207; KochanKatzMower, op. cit.