HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn H., “The Population Ecology of Organizations,”American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82 (March 1977): 929–964; and AldrichHoward E., Organizations and Environments (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979).
2.
PorterMichael E., Competitive Strategy (New York, NY: Free Press, 1980).
3.
MilesRaymond E.SnowCharles C., Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978).
4.
ChandlerAlfred D.Jr., Strategy and Structure (New York, NY: Doubleday, 1962).
5.
DavisStanley M.LawrencePaul R., Matrix (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977).
6.
MilesRaymond E.SnowCharles C., “Fit, Failure, and the Hall of Fame,”California Management Review, Vol. XXVI (Spring 1984): 10–28.
7.
Ibid.
8.
Economists do not agree on a single definition of industry health. Classical equilibrium theory states that firms in a competitive industry should not make profits in excess of the normal bank rate of return. Another economic theory, however, says that excess profits are required for industry innovation. Yet another theory maintains that excess profits may be rightfully earned by firms that minimize buyers' search and information-processing costs (by consistently offering high-quality products;, etc.). Our criteria of long-run industry health are taken from Paul R. Lawrence and Davis Dyer, Renewing American Industry (New York, NY: Free Press, 1983).
9.
MilesSnow, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, op. cit., Chapter 10.
10.
GoldharJoel D.JelinekMariann, “Plan for Economies of Scope,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 61 (November/December 1983): 141–148.
11.
See GalbraithJay R., “Designing the Innovating Organization,”Organizational Dynamics (Winter 1982), pp. 5–25; and PinchotGiffordIII, Intrapreneuring (New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1985).