Sales and Marketing Management, “Survey of Selling Costs” (26 February 1979), p. 57.
2.
WalkerOrville C.Jr.ChurchillGilbert A.Jr.FordNeil M., “Motivation and Performance in Industrial Selling: Present Knowledge and Needed Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 (May 1977), pp. 156–168.
3.
MontgomeryDavid B.UrbanGlen L., Management Science in Marketing (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969); DavisKenneth R.WebsterFrederick E.Jr., Sales Force Management (New York: Ronald Press Company, 1968).
4.
LilienGary L., “ADVISOR 2: Modeling the Marketing Mix Decision for Industrial Products,”Management Science, Vol. 25 (February 1979), pp. 191–204.
5.
BuzzellRobert D.FarrisPaul W., “Industrial Marketing Costs: An Analysis of Variations in Manufacturers' Marketing Expenditures,” Report Number 76–118 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute, 1976).
6.
GlazeThomas A.WeinbergCharles B., “A Sales Territory Alignment Program and Account Planning System,” in BagozziRichard (ed.), Sales Management: New Developments from Behavioral and Decision Model Research (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute, 1979); HessSidney W.SamuelsStuart A., “Experiences with a Sales Districting Model: Criteria and Implementation,”Management Science, Part II, Vol. 18 (December 1971), pp. 41–54; LodishLeonard, “‘Vaguely Right’ Approach to Sales Force Allocation,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 52 (January–February 1974), pp. 119–124; ShankerRoy J.TurnerRonald E.ZoltnersAndris A., “Sales Territory Design: An Integrated Approach,”Management Science, Vol. 22 (November 1975), pp. 309–320.
7.
ZoltnersAndris A.GardnerKathy S., “A Review of Salesforce Decision Models,” unpublished working paper (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University, 1980).
8.
MitchellTerence R., People in Organizations: Understanding Their Behavior (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978).
9.
DavisRobert T., “Sales Management in the Field,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 36 (January–February 1958), pp. 91–98; idem, “A Sales Manager in Action,” in BoydH. W.Jr.DavisR.T. (eds.), Readings in Sales Management (Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1970); LivingstonJ.S., “Pygmalion in Management,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 47 (July–August 1969), pp. 81–89.
10.
BagozziRichard P., “Towards a General Theory for the Explanation of the Performance of Salespeople,” unpublished doctoral dissertation (Northwestern University, 1976); RyansAdrian B.WeinbergCharles B., “Sales Territory Response,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16 (November 1979), pp. 453–465; WalkerChurchillFord, op. cit.
11.
Researchers attempting to estimate the effect of exogenous and situational factors on outcomes such as performance or job satisfaction must be concerned about whether the implemented sales force organization, policies, and procedures have suppressed the effects of interest. If the sales force's management has a policy of assigning territories of equal potential, then it would make little sense to include this variable in a research study designed to relate territory sales performance to territory characteristics. However, it would be incorrect to assume that territory potential has no effect on sales performance.
12.
WalkerOrville C.Jr.ChurchillGilbert A.Jr.FordNeil M., “Where Do We Go From Here?—Selected Conceptual and Empirical Issues Concerning the Motivation arid Performance of the Industrial Sales Force,” paper presented at the American Institute for Decision Sciences, St. Louis (1978), p. 4.
13.
Mitchell, op. cit.
14.
RyansAdrian B.WeinbergCharles B., “Managerial Implications of Models of Territory Sales Response,” in BeckwithNeil (eds.), 1979 Educators' Conference Proceedings (Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association, 1979), pp. 426–430; RyansWeinberg, op. cit.
15.
This is similar to the conceptualization used by HackmanJ. RichardMorrisCharles G. in their discussion of the performance of task groups. See HackmanJ. RichardMorrisCharles G., “Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness,” in BerkowitzL. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7 (New York: Academic Press, 1975).
16.
WalkerChurchillFord, “Motivation and Performance.”
17.
Ibid., p. 162.
18.
Mitchell, op. cit.
19.
Bagozzi, op. cit.
20.
HerzbergFrederickMausnerBernardSnydermanBarbara B., The Motivation to Work (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1975).
21.
WalkerChurchillFord, “Motivation and Performance.”
22.
WalkerChurchillFord, “Where Do We Go?”
23.
McClellandDavid, the originator of the need-for-achievement theory, has reported some success in increasing the level of need for achievement in adults through training. See McClellandDavid C., The Achieving Society (Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand, 1961).
24.
TyboutAlice M., “The Relative Effectiveness of Three Behavioral Influence Strategies as Supplements to Persuasion in a Marketing Context,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15 (May 1978), pp. 229–242; VarellaJacob A., Psychological Solutions to Social Problems (New York: Academic Press, 1971).
25.
DeJongWilliam, “An Examination of Self-Perception Mediation of the Foot-in-the-Door Effect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37 (December 1979), pp. 2221–2239; YalchRichard F., “Closing Sales: Compliance-Gaining Strategies for Personal Selling,” in Bagozzi (ed.), op. cit. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute, 1979).
26.
Yalch, op. cit., p. 197.
27.
FossRobert D.DempseyCarolyn B., “Blood Donation and the Foot-in-the-Door Technique: A Limiting Case,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37 (1979), pp. 580–590; Yalch, op. cit.
28.
WalkerChurchillFord, “Motivation and Performance.”
29.
LodishLeonard, “CALLPLAN: An Interactive Salesman's Call Planning System,”Management Science, Part II, Vol. 18 (December 1971), pp. 25–40.
30.
FudgeWilliam K.LodishLeonard M., “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Model Based Salesman's Call Planning System by Field Experimentation,”Interfaces, Part II, Vol. 8 (November 1977), pp. 97–106.
31.
WalkerChurchillFord, “Motivation and Performance,” and “Where Do We Go?”
32.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr.FordNeil M.WalkerOrville C.Jr., “Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction in the Salesforce,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13 (November 1976), pp. 323–332; and Bagozzi, op. cit.
33.
WalkerOrville C.Jr.ChurchillGilbert A.FordNeil M., “Organizational Determinants of the Industrial Salesman's Role Conflict and Ambiguity,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 (January 1975), pp. 32–39.
34.
WeitzBarton A., “Relationship Between Salesperson Performance and Understanding of Customer Decision-Making,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15 (November 1978), pp. 501–516.
35.
EvansFranklin, “Selling as a Dyadic Relationship—A New Approach,”American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 6 (May 1963), pp. 76–79; GadelM.S., “Concentration by Salesmen on Congenial Prospects,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 (January 1964), pp. 64–66.
36.
CaponNoelHolbrookMorris B.HubertJames M., “Selling Processes and Buying Behavior: Theoretical Implications of Recent Research,” in WoodsideArch G.ShethJagdish N.BennettPeter D. (eds.), Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior (New York: Elsevier North-Holland, 1977), pp. 323–332.
37.
BrockTimothy C., “Communicator-Recipient Similarity and Decision Change,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 1 (June 1965), pp. 650–654; BuschPaulWilsonDavid T., “An Experimental Analysis of a Salesman's Expent and Referent Bases of Social Power in the Buyer-Seller Dyad,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13 (February 1976), pp. 3–11.
38.
BagozziRichard P., “Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction as a Function of Individual Difference, Interpersonal, and Situational Factors,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15 (November 1978), pp. 517–531; idem, “Performance and Satisfaction in an Industrial Sales Force: An Examination of their Antecedents and Simultaneity,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44 (Spring 1980), pp. 65–77. The omission of territory potential from the Bagozzi 1980 model is surprising given the highly significant correlation between it and both performance and job satisfaction in his earlier paper. The framework proposed here emphasizes the need to include relevant precursors.
39.
LockeEdwin A., “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction,” in DunnetteM.D. (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally, 1976), pp. 1297–1349.
40.
WilliamsonOliver E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: The Free Press, 1975).
41.
However, considerable theoretical attention has been devoted to the design of optimal compensation systems under assumptions about the salesperson's objective function and constraints under which the salesperson operates. See FarleyJohn U., “Optimal Plan for Salesmen's Compensation,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 1 (May 1964), pp. 39–43; SrinivasanVenkataraman, “The Non-Optimality of Equal Commission Rates in Multi-Product Sales Force Compensation Schemes,” Working Paper No. 529 (Stanford, California: Graduate School of Business, 1979); and WeinbergCharles B., “Jointly Optimal Sales Commissions for Non-Income Maximizing Sales Force,”Management Science, Vol. 24 (August 1978), pp. 1252–1258.
42.
Territory sales response models could be used in some situations to increase the statistical precision of the experiment.
43.
DarmonRene Y., “Salesmen's Response to Financial Incentives: An Empirical Study,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 11 (November 1974), pp. 418–426.
44.
WalkerChurchillFord, “Motivation and Performance,” and “Where Do We Go?”
45.
Ibid.
46.
Bagozzi's research can be viewed as straddling both types of models, as it, for example, also examines some motivational components. See Bagozzi, “Salesperson Performance”; BeswickCharles A.CravensDavid W., “A Multistage Decision Model for Sales Force Management,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 (May 1977); LucasHenry C.Jr.WeinbergCharles B.ClowesKenneth, “Sales Response as a Function of Territorial Potential and Sales Representative Workload,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 12 (August 1975), pp. 298–305; and RyansWeinberg, “Sales Territory.”
47.
RyansWeinberg, “Managerial Implications.”
48.
Varella, op. cit.; Tybout, op. cit.
49.
CaryFrank T., “IBM's Guidelines to Employee Privacy,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 54 (September-October, 1976), pp. 82–90.
50.
ByhamWilliam C.SpitzerMorton E., “Personal Testing: The Law and Its Implications,”Personnel, Vol. 48 (September–October 1971), pp. 8–19.