RiesmanDavidGlazerNathanDennyReuel, The Lonely Crowd (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1950).
2.
KassarjianWaltraud, “A Study of Riesman's Theory of Social Character,”Sociometry, Vol. 25 (September 1962), pp. 213–30.
3.
Ibid.
4.
Ibid.
5.
Richard Centers, “An Examination of the Riesman Social Character Typology: A Metropolitan Survey,”Sociometry, Vol. 25 (September 1962), pp. 231–40.
6.
Richard Centers and HorowitzMiriam, “Social Character and Conformity: A Differential Susceptibility to Social Influence,”Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 60 (July 1963), pp. 343–49.
7.
KassarjianHaroldKassarjianWaltraud, “Occupational Interests, Social Values, and Social Character,”Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 12 (Spring 1965), pp. 48–54.
8.
KassarjianHarold H., “Social Character and Differential Preference for Mass Communication,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 2 (May 1965), pp. 146–53.
9.
DonnellyJames H.Jr., “Social Character and Acceptance of New Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 7 (February 1970), pp. 111–13.
10.
DonnellyJames H.Jr.IvancevichJohn M., “A Methodology for Identifying Innovative Characteristics of New Brand Purchasers,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 9 (August 1974) pp. 331–34.
11.
MizerskiRichard W.SettleRobert B., “The Influence of Social Character on Preference for Social Versus Objective Information in Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16 (November 1979), pp. 552–58.
12.
EvansF.B., “Ford Versus Chevrolet: Park Forest Revisited,”Journal of Business, Vol. 41 (October 1968), pp. 445–59; idem, “Psychological and Objective Factors in the Prediction of Brand Choice: Ford Versus Chevrolet,”Journal of Business, Vol. 32 (October 1956), pp. 340–69; ItoRikuma, “Differential Attitudes of New Car Buyers,”Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 7 (March 1967), pp. 34–42.
13.
JacobsonEugeneKassoffJerome, “Self-Precept and Consumer Attitudes Towards Small Cars,”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 47 (October 1963), pp. 242–45; MayF.E., “Adaptive Behavior in Automotive Brand Choices,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6 (February 1969), pp. 62–64; BirdwellA.E., “A Study of the Influence of Image Congruence on Consumer Choice,”Journal of Business, Vol. 41 (January 1968), pp. 76–88; SettleRobert B.GibbyBruce L., “The Measurement of Attributed Image,”California Management Review, Vol. 14 (Summer 1972), pp. 70–74; and IvancevichDonnelly, op. cit.
14.
WestfallRalph, “Psychological Factors in Predicting Product Choice,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 26 (April 1962), pp. 34–40; WisemanFrederick, “Segmentation Analysis on Automobile Buyers During the New Model Year Transition Period,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35 (April 1971), pp. 42–49; HughesDavid G.GurroJose L., “Automobile Self-Congruity Models Reexamined,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 8 (February 1971), pp. 125–27; HenryWalter, “Cultural Values Do Correlate with Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13 (May 1976), pp. 121–27; BellGerald D., “The Automobile Buyer After the Purchase,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31 (July 1967), pp. 12–16.
15.
Business Week, “U.S. Autos: Losing a Big Segment of the Market Forever?” (24 March 1980), pp. 78–88.
Variables include: Social class—see PetersW.H., “Relative Occupational Class Income: A Significant Variable in the Marketing of Automobiles,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 (April 1970), pp. 74–77; and Henry, op. cit.; occupation—see Peters, op. cit.; Wiseman, op. cit.; NewmanJoseph W.StaelinRichard, “Prepurchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Major Household Appliances,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 9 (August 1972), pp. 249–57; FeldmanLaurence P.ArmstrongGary M., “Identifying Buyers of a Major Automotive Innovation,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39 (January 1975), pp. 47–53, and PetersW.H., “Using MCA to Segment New Car Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 7 (August 1970), pp. 360–63; education—see Peters, “Relative Occupational Class”; Wiseman, op. cit.; NewmanStaelin, op. cit.; and FeldmanArmstrong, op. cit.; stage in family life cycle—see Wiseman, op. cit.; and NewmanStaelin, op. cit.; age—see Evans, “Ford”; Peters, “Using MCA”; FeldmanArmstrong, op. cit.; and Henry, op. cit.; and number of children—see Evans, “Ford” and “Psychological and Objective”; Peters, “Using MCA”; and Henry, op. cit.
18.
GitlowHoward S., “Discrimination Procedures for the Analysis of Nominally Scaled Data Sets,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16 (August 1979), pp. 387–93.
19.
As part of a response-rate study, an additional one thousand subjects from the same sample frame were mailed the questionnaire minus the 1-0 Social Preference Scale. There were no significant differences between the two groups on the basis of the prestige category of automobiles purchased, the percent of automobiles purchased for use as a second car, social class, income, life-cycle stage, or distribution of working wives. The overall response rate was 32.1 percent. Therefore, one may assume minimal demographic differences between respondents and nonrespondents in the present study.
20.
Birdwell, op. cit.
21.
Donnelly, op. cit.; DonnellyIvancevich, op. cit.; and WoodsideArch G., “Social Characteristics of Product Use, and Advertising Appeals,”Journal of Advanced Research, Vol. 8 (December 1968), pp. 31–36.
22.
HollingsheadAlfred B.RedlichFrederick, Social Class and Mental Illness (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958).
23.
NieNorman H.HullC. H.JenkinsJeanSteinbrennerKarenBentDale, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd edition (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975).
24.
PressS. James, Applied Multivariate Analysis (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1972).
25.
McCrohanKevin F.KarounousVicki, “DIS-CRIM: A Program to Validate SPSS Classification Functions,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15 (August 1978), pp. 250–51.
26.
EisenbeisRobert A.AveryRobert B., Discriminant Analysis and Classification Procedures (Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath and Company, 1972).
27.
Henry, op. cit.
28.
Peters, “Using MCA.”
29.
Henry, op. cit.
30.
Peters, “Using MCA.”
31.
KassarjianWaltraud, op. cit.; Centers, op. cit.
32.
The authors thank Professor KassarjianHarold H. for his comments on earlier versions of this manuscript, and acknowledge the guidance of KellerI. HaroldGitlowHoward S., They also thank Carl Kirschner and Thomas Daly for their assistance in preparing the manuscript, and Mrs. Eleanor Kaplow and Eunice Bailey for their editorial efforts.