BellDaniel, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (New York: Basic Books, 1973), Introduction, Chaps. 2, 3.
2.
BergIvar, Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery (New York: Praeger, 1970); JencksChristopherInequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America (New York: Basic Books, 1972); BowlesSamuelGintisHerbertSchooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life (New York: Basic Books, 1976).
3.
KearneyWilliam J., “Management Development Programs Can Pay Off,”Business Horizons (April 1975), pp. 81–88.
4.
“The Royal Road: Higher Education,” in WarnerW LloydAbegglenJames C., Big Business Leaders in America (New York: Harper & Row, 1955); Training Can Make a Difference, U.S. Civil Service Commission, Bureau of Intergovernmental Personnel Programs (November 1973), p. i.
5.
“Personnel Training and Development,” in MussenPaul H.RosenzweigMark R. (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 22 (1971), pp. 580–82; DubinS. S.MezackM.NeidigR., “Improving the Evaluation of Management Development Programs,”Training and Development Journal (June 1974), pp. 42–46.
6.
KepnerCharles H.TregoeBenjamin B., The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965); ArgyrisChrisSimonH. A., “Some Limits of Rational Man Organization Theory,” and “Organization Man: Rational or Self-Actualizing?”Public Administration Review, (May-June and July-August, 1973), pp. 253–267, 346–357.
7.
KepnerCharles H.TregoeBenjamin B., “Developing Decision Makers,”Harvard Business Review (September-October 1960), pp. 115–124.
8.
These studies are, respectively: GoldsteinStanleyGormanJamesSmithBlanchard B., “A Partnership in Evaluation,”Training and Development Journal (April 1973), pp. 10–14; WhiteS. TodDr., “Assessment of Selected USDA Management Development Programs,”Office of Personnel, U.S. Department of Agriculture (September 1973); ManyakTerrell G., “A Comparative Evaluation of Kepner-Tregoe and Managerial Grid Training,”Personnel Research Unit, The Port of New York Authority (23 July 1973); and “The Evaluation of ATS at Woodhaven: A Preliminary Report—28 July, 1967,”Kepner Tregoe, Inc.
9.
The handbook is BlakeRobert R.MoutonJane Srygley, The Managerial Grid: Key Orientations For Achieving Production Through People (Gulf Publishing Company, 1964). “Sigma” is reported in Blake and Mouton, op. cit., BarnesLouis B.GreinerLarry E., “Breakthrough in Organization Development,”Harvard Business Review (November-December 1964) pp. 133–155; and GreinerLarry E., “Antecedents of Planned Organization Change,”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (1967), pp. 51–84. The other reports are: SmithPeter B.HonourTrudie F., “The Impact of Phase I Managerial Grid Training,”Journal of Management Studies (1969), pp. 318–330; WilliamsA.P.O., “The Managerial Grid: Phase 2,”Occupational Psychology (1971), pp. 253–272; HartHoward A., “The Grid Appraised—Phases 1 and 2,”Personnel (September-October 1974), pp. 45–59; and Manyak, op. cit.
10.
KirkpatrickDonald L., “Evaluation of Training,” Chapter 5 in the American Society for Training and Development, Training and Development Handbook (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967), p. 88.
11.
BelascoJames A.TriceHarrison M., The Assessment of Change in Training and Therapy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969), especially pp. 24–27 and passim; and ArgyrisChris, “Some Unintended Consequences of Rigorous Research,”Psychological Bulletin (1968), pp. 185–197.
12.
See particularly CampbellDonald T., “Administrative Experimentation, Institutional Records, and Nonreactive Measures,” reprinted in EvanWilliam M. (ed.), Organizational Experiments: Laboratory and Field Research (New York: Harper & Row, 1971) and more generally WebbEugene J., Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966).
13.
Blake, op. cit., p. 145.
14.
Ibid., pp. 146, 142.
15.
BlakeMouton, op. cit., pp. 210–246.
16.
StinchcombeA. L., “The Bureaucratic Model and Career Organization,” in his Creating Efficient Industrial Administrations (New York: Academic Press, 1974), chap. 5.
17.
The classic statement has long been CampbellJohn P.DunnetteM. D.LawlerE. E.WeickK. E., Managerial Behavior, Performance and Effectiveness, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970); see also, KallmanErnest A.ReinharthLeonWahbaMahmoud A., “Organizational Effectiveness: A Review of Theory and Research,”Baruch School of Business and Public Administration, 1977; PhillipsR. GarlandJr.HeislerWilliam J.SingerNeal M., A Methodology for Determining the Value of Managerial Training, an unpublished document of the Bureau of Training, U.S. Civil Service Commission.
18.
Campbell, op. cit., p. 283 ff.; WeissCarol H., Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972), pp. 84–88.
19.
GoldsteinGormanSmith, op. cit., p. 12.
20.
Blake, op. cit., pp. 142–145.
21.
GreinerLarry E., “Antecedents of Planned Organization Change,”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (1967), pp. 58–85.
22.
MorseNancy C.ReimerEverett, “The Experimental Change of a Major Organizational Variable,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (1956), pp. 120–129.
23.
CampbellDonald T.StanleyJulian C., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963). See especially the risks of ex post facto analyses, pp. 70–71.
24.
Campbell, op. cit., pp. 278–280.
25.
Hart, op. cit., pp. 49, 51.
26.
Although the study reports performance only for the month before and the month after the training month, informal reports indicate that the “before” differences had existed for several months before, and “after” differences persisted for several months after. Personal communication from WhiteStoller TodDr. (March 1977).
27.
See WeissCarol H., op. cit., especially chap. 6, “Utilization of Evaluation Results”; and CampbellDonald. T.ErlebacherAlbert, “How Regression Artifacts in Quasi-Experimental Evaluations Can Mistakenly Make Compensatory Education Look Harmful,” in StrueningElmer L.GuttentagMarcia, Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 1, pp. 597–617.