DeVriesDavid L. (chairman), “Performance Appraisal and Feedback: Flies in the Ointment,” Symposium presented at the 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1976.
2.
CummingsL. L.SchwabDonald P., Performance in Organizations (Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1973), chapters 6 and 7.
3.
McGregorDouglas, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960), chapter 6; ArgyrisChris, Personality and Organization: The Conflict Between The System and The Individual (New York: Harper & Bros., 1957), and Integrating the Individual and the Organization (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964), chapter 12; and DruckerPeter F., The Practice of Management (New York: Harper & Bros., 1954).
4.
MeyerHerbertKayEmanualFrenchJohn R. F.Jr., “Split Roles in Performance Appraisal,”Harvard Business Review (1965), p. 123ff.
5.
BeerMichaelRunRobert, “Employee Growth Through Performance Management,”Harvard Business Review (1976), pp. 59–66.
6.
SteersRichard M.PorterLyman W., “The Role of Task-Goal Attributes in Employee Performance,”Psychological Bulletin (1974), pp. 434–452.
7.
LockeE. A.CartledgeN.KnerrC. S., “Studies of the Relationship Between Satisfaction, Goal-Setting and Performance,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (1970), pp. 135–158.
8.
PierceJon L.DunhamRandall B., “Task Design: A Literature Review,”Academy of Management Review (1976), pp. 83–97.
9.
CummingsL. L., “A Field Experimental Study of the Effects of Two Performance Appraisal Systems,”Personnel Psychology (1973), pp. 489–502.
10.
GrellerM. M.HeroldD. M., “Sources of Feedback: A Preliminary Investigation,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (1975), pp. 244–256.
11.
GrellerM. M., “Employee Reactions to Performance Feedback,”Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, New York University, 1976.
12.
These systems are developed in greater detail in Cummings and Schwab, op. cit.