See SuperD., The Psychology of Careers (New York: Harper & Row, 1957) and SarasonS. B.SarasonE. K.CowdenP., “Aging and the Nature of Work,”American Psychologist (Vol. 30, No. 5, 1975).
2.
See ScheinE. H., “How Graduates Scare Bosses,”Careers Today (Vol. 1, No. 1, 1968) and LivingstonJ. S., “The Troubled Transition: Why College and University Graduates Have Difficulty Developing Careers in Business,”Journal of College Placement (April-May 1970).
3.
See JenningsE. E., The Executive in Crisis (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965); HenryW. E., “Psychodynamics of the Executive Role,”American Journal of Sociology (Vol. 54, No. 4, 1969); CumminP. C., “TAT Correlates of Executive Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 51, No. 1, 1967); and CampbellJ. P.DunnetteM. D.LawlerE. E.WeickK. E., Managerial Behavior, Performance and Effectiveness (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970).
4.
See L.I.A.M.A.Recruitment, Selection, Training, and Supervision in Life Insurance (Hartford: Life Insurance Agency Management Association, 1966) and WanousJ. P., “Effects of Realistic Job Preview on Job Acceptance, Job Attitudes, and Job Survival,”Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 58, No. 3, 1973).
5.
See BerlewD. E.HallD. T., “The Socialization of Managers: Effects of Expectations on Performance,”Administrative Science Quarterly (Vol. 11, No. 3. 1966) and HallD. T.LawlerE. E., “Unused Potential in Research and Development Organizations,”Research Management (Vol. 12, No. 5, 1969).
EriksonErik, Identity: Youth and Crisis (New York: W. W. Norton, 1968), pp. 87; 132.
9.
The term subidentity was introduced by MillerDaniel in “The Study of Social Relationships: Situation, Identity, and Social Interaction,” in KochS. (ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973). For applications of the concept to the study of careers, see HallD. T., “A Model of Coping with Role Conflict: The Role Behavior of College Educated Women,”Administrative Science Quarterly (Vol. 17, No. 4, 1972).
10.
See LewinK.DemboT.FestingerL.SearsP., “Levels of Aspiration” in HuntJ. McV. (ed.), Personality and the Behavior Disorders (New York: Ronald Press, 1944) and ArgyrisC., Integrating the Individual and the Organization (New York: Wiley, 1964).
11.
For further discussion of the development of the model, see HallD. T., “Potential for Career Growth,”Personnel Journal (Vol. 34, No. 3, 1971) and HallD. T.HallF. S., “The Relationship Between Goals, Success, Self-Image and Involvement Under Different Organization Climates,”Journal of Vocational Behavior (1977, in press).
12.
BollesC., What Color is Your Parachute? (Berkeley, Calif.: Ten Speed Press, 1972).
13.
See GlueckW. F., Personnel: A Diagnostic Approach (Dallas: Business Publications, 1974).
14.
See GolembiewskiR. T., Renewing Organizations: The Laboratory Approach to Planned Change (Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1972).
15.
See SiegelJ. P., “The Subject Evaluates the Test: Knowledge of Results and the Self-Concept,”Proceedings, 77th Annual Convention. American Psychological Association, 1969.
16.
See McGregorD., “An Uneasy Look at Performance Appraisal,”Harvard Business Review (Vol. 35, No. 3, 1957) and MeyerH. H.KayE.FrenchJ. R. P.Jr., “Split Roles in Performance Appraisal,”Harvard Business Review (Vol. 43, No. 1, 1965).
17.
See TosiH. L.RizzoJ. R.CarrollS. J., “Setting Goals in Management by Objectives,”California Management Review (Summer 1970) and LevinsonH., “Management by Whose Objectives?”Harvard Business Review (Vol. 48, No. 4, 1970).
18.
The A. T. & T. program is described in BrayD. W.CampbellR. J.GrantD. L., Formative Years in Business: A Long-term AT&T Study of Management Lives (New York: Wiley, 1974). The popularity of the assessment center is documented by Campbell, op. cit., and Glueck, op. cit. The provisions for feedback are described in ByhamW. C., “The Assessment Center as an Aid in Management Development,”Training and Development Journal (December 1971), and research on the effectiveness of assessment centers is summarized in HowardA., “An Assessment of Assessment Centers,”Academy of Management Journal (Vol. 17, No. 1, 1974).
19.
See Byham, op. cit., and Howard, op. cit.
20.
See Byham, op. cit.
21.
See LewinK., “Group Decision and Social Change,” in SwansonG. E.NewcombT. M.HartleyF. L. (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology, rev. ed. (New York: Holt, 1952).
22.
For descriptions of applications, see Golembiewski, op. cit., and LehnerG. F. J., “From Job Loss to Career Innovation,” in BurkeW. W. (ed.), Contemporary Organization Development: Conceptual Orientations and Interventions (Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1972).
23.
See HuseE. F., Organization Development and Change (St. Paul: West Publishing, 1975).
24.
See FordyceJ. K.WeilR., Managing with People (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1971).