MintzbergHenry, The Nature of Managerial Work (New York: Harper and Row, 1973).
2.
See AckoffRussell L., Redesigning the Future (New York: Wiley, 1974), for a detailed but readable explication of the differences.
3.
MitroffI. I.BetzF.PondyL.SagastiF., “Managing Science in the Systems Age,”Interfaces (1974), pp. 46–58.
4.
Mintzberg, op. cit.
5.
Ackoff, op. cit.; ChurchmanC. West, Challenge to Reason (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972); ChurchmanC. West, The Systems Approach (New York: Delacorte, 1968); RittelHorstWeberM. M., “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,”Policy Sciences (1973), pp. 155–169; VickersG., The Art of Judgement (New York: Basic Books, 1965).
6.
For a detailed exposition of this process, see MitroffI. I.KilmannR. H., “Stories Managers Tell: A New Tool for Organizational Problem Solving,”Management Review (July 1975), pp. 18–28; see also McKenneyJ. L.KeenP. G. W., “How Managers' Minds Work,”Harvard Business Review (May-June 1974), pp. 79–90.
7.
See MasonR. O., “A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning,”Management Science (April 1968), pp. B403–B-414.
8.
MitroffI. I.FeatheringhamT. R., “On Systemic Problem Solving and the Error of the Third Kind,”Behavioral Science (November 1974), pp. 383–393.
9.
HawkensD. I.CocanougherA. B., “Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education,”Journal of Marketing (1972), pp. 61–64.
10.
For a more complete report, see MitroffI. I.KilmannR. H.SmethersD. A.BuchholtzR., “Corporate Bribes: Their Necessity, Desirability, and Usefulness—A Dialectical Policy Analysis,” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, 1976.