ChamberlainNeil W., The Limits of Corporate Responsibility (New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 202.
2.
Ibid.
3.
VotawDowSethiS. Prakash (eds.), The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values Versus Contemporary Problems (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973), p. 74.
4.
BauerRaymond A., “A Free Market for Responsibility,”The Center Magazine (January-February 1972), p. 51.
5.
WaltonClarence C., Ethos and the Executive (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969), p. 6.
6.
SiegelSidney, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956), p. 208.
7.
“Earnings Per Share: For most companies, the figures shown … are the ‘primary’ earnings given in annual reports; these reflect not only the common share outstanding but all ‘common-stock equivalents,’ a concept that includes any debentures, preferred stock, or warrants whose market value is governed primarily by price movements of the common… . Earnings for 1974 … are weighted averages of outstanding shares, which all companies now report. Weighted averages are used for 1964 where these are available; where they are not, figures are based on a simple average of 1963 and 1964 year-end share outstanding. Per-share earnings for 1973 and 1964 are adjusted for stock splits and stock dividends. They are not restated for mergers, acquisitions, or accounting changes made after 1964… . The growth rate is the average annual growth, compounded. No growth rate is given if the company had a loss in either 1964 or 1974.” (The Fortune Double 500 Directory, 1975, p. 24).
