Congressional Research Service, Variable Rate Mortgages, Pro and Con Arguments and an Annotated List of References, 1968–71 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972).
2.
TuckerD. P., “The Variable-Rate, Graduated-Payment Mortgage,”Real Estate Review (Spring 1975).
3.
Ways to Moderate Fluctuations in Housing Construction (Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System, 1972).
4.
“Board Proposes Variable Rate Mortgages for Federal Savings and Loans,”Federal Home Loan Bank Journal (March 1975).
5.
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Policies for a More Competitive Financial System: A Review of the President's Commission on Financial Structure and Regulation (Boston, 1972).
6.
“In Stimulation and Real Life: Variable Rates Really Work,”Savings and Loan News (January 1971).
7.
AndersonP. S.HinsonJ. P., “Variable Rates on Mortgages: Their Impact and Use,”New England Economic Review (September-October 1972).
8.
von FurstenbergG., The Economics of Mortgages with Variable Interest Rates (Washington, D.C.: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, 1973).
9.
MarcisR. G., “Variable Rate Mortgages: Their Use and Impact in the Mortgage and Capital Markets,”American Real Estate and Urban Economics Journal (Spring 1974).
MandalaA., “Congressional Showdown Culminates VRM Conflict,”National Savings and Loan League Journal (May 1975).
24.
McElhoneJ. M.CassidyH. J., “Mortgage Lending: Its Changing Economic and Demographic Environment,”Federal Home Loan Bank Journal (July 1974).
25.
SchuchatD., “Ford Sends '75 Financial Reform Bill to Congress,”National Real Estate Investor (June 1975).
26.
Report of the President's Commission on Financial Structure and Regulation (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1971).
27.
AllenC., “The Hunt Commission Report,”Federal Home Loan Bank Journal (September 1973).
28.
BeasleyH.HallahanW., “Financial Institution Reform: Center of Controversy,”National Savings and Loan League Journal (October 1973).
29.
“S and L Changes are Urged in Hunt Commission Report,”National Savings and Loan League Journal (January 1972).
30.
SchmultsH., “FIA: 1975 Version,”National Savings and Loan League Journal (February 1975).
31.
PatmanW., “Hunt Proposals—A Fiasco,”National Savings and Loan Journal (November 1973).
32.
BoormanJ. T.PetersonM., “The Hunt Commission and the Mortgage Market: An Appraisal,”Journal of Bank Research (August 1972).
33.
HaywoodC. F.LinkeC. M., The Regulation of Discount Interest Rates (Chicago: Association of Reserve City Bankers, 1968).
34.
“Recommendations of the President's Commission on Financial Structures and Regulation,”Mortgage Banker (February 1972).
35.
LeiboldA., “A Perspective on the Hunt Report,”National Savings and Loan League Journal (February 1972).
36.
“Financing Report Disappointing on Home Mortgage,”NAHB Journal of Homebuilding (February 1972).
37.
BurnhamJ. B., “Asset Diversification and the Housing Cycle,”Federal Home Loan Bank Journal (March 1972).
38.
GreblerL., The Future of Thrift Institutions: A Study of Diversification vs. Specialization (Danville, Ill.: Joint Savings Bank and Savings and Loan Exchange Groups, 1969).
39.
AndersonP. S.EisenmergerR. W., “Structural Reform for Thrift Institutions: The Experience in the United States and Canada,”New England Economic Review (July-August 1972).
40.
SchwartzM., “The Mortgage Tax Credit Proposal,”Journal of Real Estate Taxation (Summer 1975).
41.
JonesO., “Reforming the Financial Structure—Again!”Mortgage Banker (October 1973).
42.
Committee for Economic Development, Financing the Nation's Housing Needs (New York, 1973).
43.
MandalaA., “Financial Institution Reform: Aid or Disaster for Housing,”National Savings and Loan League Journal (September 1973).
