BosselmanCalliesD., The Quiet Revolution in Land Use Control (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1971), p. 315.
2.
SieganB. H., “Opposition: National Land Use Legislation,”California Real Estate Magazine (February 1975), pp. 33–35.
3.
California Builder (August 1975), p. 4.
4.
House and Home (August 1975), p. 12.
5.
ScottR., “A View from the Mount: Laurels and Criticisms for a Major Judicial Advance,”Environmental Comment (July 1975).
6.
RoseJ. G., “The Mount Laurel Decision: Is it Based on Wishful Thinking?”Real Estate Law Journal (v. 4:35), pp. 61–70.
7.
HagmanD. G.MisczynskiD., “The Quiet Federalization of Land Use Controls: Disquietude in the Land Markets,”Real Estate Appraiser (September-October 1974), pp. 5–9.
8.
ThomasJ. G., “Environmental Legislation in California and its Relationship to Private Real Estate Development,”Appraisal Journal (October 1973), pp. 504–512.
9.
DrachmanR. P., “Land Use Under Current Constraints,”Appraisal Journal (April 1974), pp. 165–174.
10.
Information provided to the author by interested parties.
