WebsterF. E.Jr., “Does Business Misunderstand Consumerism?”, Harvard Business Review (September-October 1973), pp. 89–97.
2.
KristolI., “The Credibility of Corporations,”Wall Street Journal (19 January 1974), p. 16.
3.
LambertZ. V.DurandR. M., “Consumer Attitudes Toward Public Policy Propositions: An Ethnic and Demographic Analysis,” presented at the Fall Conference, American Marketing Association, 1973; and BarksdaleH. C.DardenW. R., “Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketing and Consumerism,”Journal of Marketing (October 1972), pp. 28–35.
4.
SeemanM., “On the Meaning of Alienation,”American Sociological Review (December 1959), pp. 783–791.
5.
KotlerP., “What Consumerism Means for Marketers,”Harvard Business Review (May-June 1972), p. 49.
6.
JonesM. G., “The Consumer Interest: The Role of Public Policy,”California Management Review (Fall 1973), p. 19.
7.
MagnusonW. G.CarperJ., The Dark Side of the Marketplace (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968), p. 8
8.
PickleH. B.BruceR., “Consumerism, Product Satisfaction-Dissatisfaction: An Empirical Investigation,”Southern Journal of Business (November 1972), pp. 87–100.
9.
Kotler, op. cit., p. 50.
10.
RosenthalB. S., “Producer Versus Consumer: The Unequal Battle,”Economic and Business Bulletin (Winter 1970), pp. 37–40.
11.
GalbraithJ. K., The New Industrial State (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1967).
12.
ClarkJ. P., “Measuring Alienation Within a Social System,”American Sociological Review (December 1959), p. 849; OlsenM. E., “Alienation and Political Opinions,”Public Opinion Quarterly (Summer 1965), pp. 201–202.
13.
PickleBruce, op. cit.
14.
Seeman, op. cit.
15.
BishopJ.Jr.HubbardH. W., Let the Seller Beware (Washington, D.C.: The National Press, 1969), p. 163.
16.
“Auto Makers Give FTC Some Lessons on Reading Car Ads,”Wall Street Journal (9 November 1973), p. 4.
17.
JonesM. G., “Business Can Stand Guard for the Consumer,”Nation's Business (November 1969), p. 52.
18.
A belief that illegitimate and unethical means are indispensable depicts the type of normlessness usually discussed by sociologists. Following in this vein, Seeman defines normlessness as a “high expectancy that socially unapproved behaviors are required to achieve given goals”; Seeman, op. cit.
19.
MagnusonCarper, op. cit., p. 61.
20.
“America's Growing Antibusiness Mood,”Business Week (17 June 1972), p. 102.
21.
BakerS. S., “The Permissible Lie,” in KangunNorman, ed., Society and Marketing (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), p. 101.
22.
Seeman defines this form of alienation as assignment of a “low reward value to goods or beliefs that are typically highly valued in a given society”; Seeman, op. cit.
23.
NettlerG., “A Measure of Alienation,”American Sociological Review (December 1957), pp. 674–675.
24.
MacdonaldD., “A Theory of Mass Culture,” and van den HaagE., “Of Happiness and Despair We Have No Measure,” in CastyA., ed., Mass Media and Mass Man (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968), pp. 5–24.
25.
ReichC. A., The Greening of America (New York: Random House, 1970), p. 7.