SamuelsonP. E., “Foreword,” in PoorR., ed., 4 Days, 40 Hours (Cambridge, Mass.: Bursk and Poor Publishing, 1970), p. 7.
2.
HellriegelD., “The Four-Day Workweek: A Review and Assessment,”MSU Business Topics (Spring 1972), p. 40.
3.
WheelerK. E.GurmanR.TarnowieskiD., The Four-Day Week (New York: American Management Association, Inc., 1972).
4.
A pioneering study in this area, but limited with respect to employee and organizational demographics, is that conducted by Steele and Poor in 1970; see SteeleJ. L.PoorR., “Work and Leisure: The Reactions of People at 4-Day Firms,” in Poor, op. cit., pp. 105–122.
5.
Hellriegel, op. cit., p. 43.
6.
KanterL. E., “An Industrial Pioneer Rescued by the 4-Day Week,” in Poor, op. cit., pp. 39–46.
7.
SteelePoor, op. cit., p. 111.
8.
WilsonJ. A., “The Meaning of the 4-Day Week: Retreat from Work or Assent to Leisure?”, Pittsburg Business Review (March-April 1972), p. 3.
9.
SeilerJ. A., Systems Analysis in Organizational Behavior (Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1967), p. 33.
10.
BrayfieldA. H.RotheH. F., “An Index of Job Satisfaction,”Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1959), pp. 307–311.
11.
Ibid.
12.
KerlingerF. N., Foundations of Behavioral Research (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964), pp. 544–553.