Economic Report on Corporate Mergers, Staff Report of the Federal Trade Commission (Washington, D. C.: 1969), particularly pp. 323–397.
2.
U. S. v Ingersoll-Rand Co., (320 F 2d 509); U. S. v General Dynamics Corp., (258F. Supp. 36); F.T.C. v Consolidated Foods, (85 sup Ct., 1965); U. S. v International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (D.C. Inc., 1971).
3.
“Federal Suit Charges GE …”The Wall Street Journal (May 19, 1972), p. 2.
4.
Economic Report …, ibid., p. 381.
5.
StockingGeorge W.MuellerWillard F., “Business Reciprocity and the Size of Firms,”The Journal of Business (April 1957), pp. 75–77.
6.
See AldersonWroe, Marketing Behavior and Executive Action (Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1957), p. 296.
7.
“Nixon Trust Policy Raked by 2 Leaders,”The Chicago Tribune (October 24, 1969), sect. 3, p. 9.
8.
“Comment: Reciprocal Dealing and the Antitrust Laws,”Harvard Law Review (March 1964), pp. 881–882.
9.
United States v General Dynamics Corporation, 258 F. Supp. (36) 1966.
10.
Ibid., at 43.
11.
Ibid., at 45.
12.
Ibid., at 43.
13.
Ibid., at 44.
14.
BrooksRobert C.Jr., “Volume Discounts as Barriers to Entry and Access,”The Journal of Political Economy (February 1961), p. 69.
15.
Economic Report on Corporate Mergers, ibid., at 350 and 396; and “Reciprocity: Dangerous Selling Tool Winning New Users,”Sales Management (May 20, 1960), p. 40.