See HershmanArlene, “The New Money in Movies,”Dun's Review (February, 1971), pp. 33–36.
2.
Ibid.
3.
JacobsLewis, The Rise of the American Film: A Critical History (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1939), pp. 3–4.
4.
PetersonTheodoreJensenJay W.RiversWilliam L., The Mass Media and Modern Society (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965), p. 49.
5.
Ibid., p. 50.
6.
Peterson, loc. cit.
7.
Jacobs, op. cit., pp. 160–164.
8.
See ibid., pp. 52–66.
9.
Ibid., p. 293.
10.
Ibid., p. 296.
11.
Ibid., pp. 292–293.
12.
U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Industrial Outlook 1970 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, December, 1969), p. 438.
13.
ConantMichael, Antitrust in the Motion Picture Industry: Economic and Legal Analysis (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960), pp. 12–14.
14.
HandelLeo A., Hollywood Looks at Its Audience: A Report of Film Audience Research (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1950).
15.
KatzElihuLazarsfeldPaul F., Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1955), pp. 296–308.
16.
Handel, op. cit., p. 3.
17.
Ibid., p. 93.
18.
Ibid., p. 94.
19.
Ibid., pp. 94–95.
20.
Author's estimate based on data from the 1957 Politz study for the Saturday Evening Post. See QuigleyMartinJr., “Who Goes to the Movies,”Motion Picture Herald (August 10, 1957), pp. 21–22.
21.
Author's estimate based on data from the 1967 Yankelovich study for the Motion Picture Association of America. See “Pix Must ‘Broaden Market,’”Variety (March 20, 1968), p. 78.
22.
Handel, loc. cit.
23.
Variety (January 22, 1958), p. 10.
24.
Handel, op. cit., p. 96.
25.
Ibid.
26.
“Pix Must 'Broaden Market,'”op. cit., p. 78.
27.
Variety (January 22, 1958), p. 10.
28.
ShawRobert, “Package Deal in Film Opinioins,”The Screen Writer (March, 1947), p. 28.
29.
Lazarsfeld, op. cit., pp. 162–163.
30.
Press release of the Motion Picture Association of America, op. cit., p. 2.
31.
“New Survey: Metropolitan New Yorkers Better Film-Goers than Suburbanites,”Variety (May 10, 1967), p. 11.
32.
Handel, op. cit., pp. 113–115.
33.
LazarsfeldPaul F.KendallPatricia, “The Communications Behavior of the Average American,” in Mass Communications, SchrammWilbur, ed. (2nd ed., Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1960), p. 433.
34.
BlumerHerbert, “Moulding of Mass Behavior Through the Motion Picture,”Publication of the American Sociological Society (August, 1935), pp. 115–127.
35.
FreidsonEliot, “Communications Research and the Concept of the Mass,”American Sociological Review (June, 1953), p. 317.
36.
“Pix Must 'Broaden Market,'”loc. cit.
37.
GoldRonald, “Folks: Pics Plavoff Too Fast,”Variety (January 24, 1968), p. 28.
38.
Smythe, “Portrait of a First-Run Audience,”op. cit., pp. 396 and 409.
39.
SmytheDallas W.LuskParker B.LewisCharles A., “Portrait of an Art-Theater Audience,”The Quarterly of Film, Radio, and Television (Fall, 1953), pp. 28–50.
40.
Press release of the Motion Picture Association of America, op. cit., p. 3.
41.
Lazarsfeld, op. cit., pp. 166–168; also, KatzLazarsfeld, op. cit., pp. 296–308.
42.
Handel, op. cit., pp. 144–150; and Lazarsfeld, op. cit., pp. 160–168.
43.
MayerJacob P., Sociology of Films: Studies and Documents (London: Faber and Faber, 1946), p. 153.
44.
MaccobyEleanor E.WilsonWilliam C., “Identification and Observational Learning from Films,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (July, 1957), pp. 76–87.
45.
MaccobyEleanor E.WilsonWilliam C.BurtonRoger V., “Differential Movie-Viewing Behavior of Male and Female Viewers,”Journal of Personality (June, 1968), pp. 259–267.
46.
AnastPhilip, “Differential Movie Appeals as Correlates of Attendance,”Journalism Quarterly (Spring, 1967), pp. 86–90.
47.
Ibid., p. 88.
48.
GansHerbert J., “The Creator-Audience Relationship in the Mass Media: An Analysis of Movie Making,” in Mass Culture: The Popular Arts in America, RosenbergBernardWhiteDavid M., eds (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1957), p. 316.