DanielD. Ronald, “Reorganization for Results,”Harvard Business Review (November-December 1966), pp. 96–104.
2.
For more details on the study see GlueckWilliam F., Organization Planning and Development, A.M.A. Research Study 106 (New York: American Management Association, 1971).
3.
Glueck, op. cit., p. 19.
4.
See, for example, WalkerArthurLorschJay, “Organizations Choice: Product Versus Function,”Harvard Business Review (November-December 1968), pp. 129–139; also, MorseJohnLorschJay, “Beyond Theory Y,”Harvard Business Review (May-June 1970), pp. 61–68.
5.
See RandallLyman K., “Common Questions and Tentative Answers Regarding Organization Development,”California Management Review (Spring 1971), pp. 45–52; and FrenchWendall, “Organization Development Objectives, Assumptions and Strategies,”California Management Review (Winter 1969), pp. 23–34.
6.
Ibid., with permission of the executives.
7.
Ibid.
8.
See SaylesLeonard, Managerial Behavior (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964), pp. 76–110.