See PaulWilliam J.Jr.RobertsonKeith B.HerzbergFrederick, “Job Enrichment Pays Off,”Harvard Business Review, (March-April, 1969), pp. 61–78.
2.
See BockmanValerie M., “The Herzberg Controversy,”Personnel Psychology (Vol. 24, No. 2, 1971), pp. 155–189.
3.
See SchoderbekPeter P.ReifWilliam E., Job Enlargement (Ann Arbor, Michigan: Bureau of Industrial Relations, Graduate School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, 1969).
4.
RushHarold M. F., “Behavioral Science—Concepts and Management Application,”Studies in Personnel Policy, No. 216 (New York: National Industrial Conference Board, 1969).
5.
FeinMitchell, Approaches to Motivation (Hillsdale, N.J.: 1970), p. 20.
6.
FordRobert N., Motivation Through the Work Itself (New York: American Management Association, Inc., 1969), p. 188.
7.
Ibid., p. 189.
8.
KennedyJames E.O'NeillHarry E., “Job Content and Workers' Opinions,”Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 42, No. 6, 1958), p. 375.
9.
HulinCharles L.BloodMilton R., “Job Enlargement, Individual Differences, and Worker Responses,”Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 69, No. 1, 1968), p. 50.
10.
See HerzbergFrederick, Work and the Nature of Man (Cleveland: The World Publishing Company, 1966); also, McGregorDouglas, Leadership and Motivation (The MIT Press, 1966); also LikertRensis, The Human Organization (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1967); also ArgyrisChris, Personality and Organization (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1957); also ArgyrisChris, Integrating the Individual and the Organization (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1964); and BlakeRobertMoutonJane, Corporate Excellence Through Grid Organizational Development (Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, 1968).
11.
McGregorDouglas, op. cit., p. 40.
12.
PaulRobertsonHerzberg, op. cit.
13.
FeinMitchell, op. cit., p. 15.
14.
SchoderbekPeter P.ReifWilliam E., op. cit., pp 41–72.
15.
RushHarold M. F., Job Design for Motivation, Conference Board Report, No. 515 (New York: The Conference Board, Inc., 1971), p. 10.
16.
SmithPatricia C., “The Prediction of Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Industrial Monotony,”Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 39, No. 5, 1955), pp. 322–329; also SmithPatricia C.LemCharles, “Positive Aspects of Motivation in Repetitive Work: Effects of Lot Size Upon Spacing of Voluntary Work Stoppages,”Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 39, No. 5, 1955), pp. 330–333; also KilbridgeMaurice D., “Do Workers Prefer Larger Jobs?”Personnel (Sept.-Oct., 1960), pp. 45–48; also BaldamusWilhelm, Efficiency and Effort: An Analysis of Industrial Administration (London: Tavistock Publications, 1967); also VroomVictor H., Some Personality Determinants of the Effects of Participation (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1960); also TurnerArthur N.MicletteAmelia L., “Sources of Satisfaction in Repetitive Work,”Occupational Psychology (Vol. 36, No. 4, 1962), pp. 215–231; and KornhauserArthur W., Mental Health of the Industrial Worker: A Detroit Study (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1965).
17.
ReifWilliam E.SchoderbekPeter P., “Job Enlargement: Antidote to Apathy,”Management of Personnel Quarterly (Spring, 1966), pp. 16–23.
18.
HulinBlood, op. cit.
19.
FeinMitchell, op. cit., p. 31.
20.
Ibid., p. 37.
21.
McClellandDavid C.WinterDavid J., Motivating Economic Achievement (New York: The Free Press, 1969).
22.
HulinBlood, op. cit., p. 49.
23.
DavisLouis E., “The Design of Jobs,”Industrial Relations (October, 1966), pp. 21–45.
24.
Herzberg, op. cit.
25.
BarnardChester I., The Functions of the Executive (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1938), p. 119.