Communications Satellite Corporation. Report Pursuant to Section 404 (b) of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 for the Year 1964 (Washington, D.C., 1965), p. 111.
2.
New York Times, July 26, 1961, p. 11.
3.
Testimony of Edward R. Murrow, Communications Satellites, Hearings Before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House, 87 Cong., I sess., 1961, serial 19, Part II, p. 586.
4.
ReigerS. H.NicholsR. T.EarlyL. B.DewsE., Communications Satellites: Technology, Economics, and System Choices (Santa Monica, Calif.: The RAND Corporation, 1963).
5.
JohnsonLeland L., “The Commercial Uses of Communications Satellites,”California Management Review, V:3 (Spring 1963), 56–57.
6.
MuellerGeorge E., “Satellites for Area Communications,”Astronautics and Aerospace Engineering (March 1963), pp. 66 ff.
7.
HavilandR. P., “Early Realization of Space Broadcasting,”First Annual Meeting of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, June 29-July 2, 1964, p. 1.
8.
HurleyNeil P., “Picture of the Future,”America, CXII:7 (Feb. 13, 1965), 218–219.
9.
MillerBarry, “Hughes Proposes TV Broadcast Satellites,”Aviation Week and Space Technology, Feb. 1,1965, pp. 75 ff.
10.
WenrickErnest D., Communication Satellites and the Mass Media: Economic Aspects (Paris: United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization meeting of experts on the use of space communications, Dec. 1965).
11.
RosenbergLaurence C., The Economics of Worldwide Television via Satellite, staff report for the Program of Policy Planning in Science and Technology, George Washington University (Washington, D.C.: 1965).
12.
These are the figures for university stations in the U.S., not for community or state-owned educational TV stations, both of which involve substantially higher investments. Cf. The Financing of Educational Television Stations (Washington, D.C.: National Association of Educational Broadcasters, 1965), pp. 18 and 27.
13.
HarbisonFrederickMyersCharles A., Education, Manpower, and Economic Growth: Strategies of Human Resource Development (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964), p. 217.
14.
BeckerGary S., Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, With Special Reference to Education (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964), p. 159.
15.
WilesP. J. D., “The Nation's Intellectual Investment,”Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, XVIII (Aug. 1956), 285 ff.; SchultzTheodore, “Capital Formation by Education,”Journal of Political Economy, LXVII (Dec. 1960), 571–583; “Education and Economic Growth,”Social Forces Influencing American Education, Sixtieth Yearbook of National Society for the Study of Education (Chicago: 1961), Part II, chap. 3; and MachlupFritz, The Production and Distribution of Knowledge of the U.S. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 188–189.
16.
Rosenberg, op. cit.
17.
Rosenberg, op. cit., p. 22.
18.
Rosenberg, op. cit., p. 48.
19.
Johnson, op. cit., p. 56.
20.
Rosenberg, op. cit., p. 33.
21.
Cf. “Companies Share in Space Project,”New York Times, Dec. 19, 1965, p. 1.
22.
“Putting Space to Work to Educate the World,”Business Week, Dec. 25, 1965, p. 17; Educational Television via Satellite (Washington, D.C.: Communications Satellite Corporation, 1966).
23.
PayRex, “Comsat Use Should Swell Dramatically,”Missiles and Rockets, Jan. 31, 1966, pp. 34 ff.
24.
JohnsonPresident Lyndon B., Address Before the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 1965.
25.
HurleyNeil P., “Satellite Communications: The Need for International Ground Rules,”America, CXV:9 (Aug. 27, 1966), 204–206.
26.
On March 20, 1967, Mr. Leonard Marks, Director of the United States Information Agency, addressed the European Broadcasting Union in Paris, France, on the realistic application of satellite radio and television for educational purposes, emphasizing the need in regions such as India.