SimkinWilliam E., “Danger Signs for Labor Arbitration,” in Labor Arbitration—Perspectives and Problems, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators (Washington, D.C.: BNA Incorporated, 1964), pp. 209–210.
2.
Ibid.
3.
For example, see personnel manual of Northrop Nortronics, Working with Northrop (Jan. 1964), pp. III-22 to III-30.
4.
CoxArchibald, “Procedure and Creativity,” in Labor Arbitration—Perspectives and Problems …, loc. cit., pp. 253–254.
5.
SmithRussell A.JonesDallas L., “Management and Labor Appraisals and Criticisms of the Arbitration Process: A Report and Comments,”Michigan. Law Review, LXII:7 (May 1964), 1116–1117.
6.
HaysPaul R., “The Future of Labor Arbitration,”Yale Law Journal, LXX:6 (May 1965).
7.
Ibid., p. 1034.
8.
FullerLon L., “Collective Bargaining and The Arbitrator,” in Collective Bargaining and the Arbitrator's Role, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators (Washington, D.C.: BNA Incorporated, 1962), p. 17.
9.
StrausDonald B., “Labor Arbitration and Its Critics,”The Arbitration Journal, XX:4 (Winter 1965).
10.
CardozoBenjamin, The Nature of the Judicial Process (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1921), pp. 174–175.
11.
McPhersonWilliam H., “Grievance Settlement Procedures in Western Europe,”Industrial Relations Research. Association, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting, December 27–28, 1962, pp. 26–27 and 33.
12.
NorgrenPaul H., The Swedish Collective Bargaining System (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1941), p. 222.
13.
“Labor Management Relations in Scandinavia,”U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bull. 1938 (Washington: U.S. Department of Labor, 1951).