This study presents a comparison of the effectiveness of computer-based expository and discovery methods of instruction for fostering the aural recognition of selected musical concepts. The expository method (EM) contained the instructional sequence (a) definition of the concept, (b) examples, (c) practice exercises. The discovery method (DM) contained the instructional sequence (a) examples, (b) practice exercises, (c) opportunity to verbalize discovery, (d) definition of the concept. The DM group spent more time than the EM group working with the software (p = .03). The groups did not differ significantly on total time spent in instruction (p = .19). No significant differences were found between treatments on the posttest or retention test. Both groups improved from pretest to posttest and declined from posttest to retention test (p < .01). A relationship was found between subjects' ability to define the concepts verbally and their ability to recognize aurally examples of the musical concepts. Greater variance was found among DM subjects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abeles, H. R., Hoffer, C. R., & Klotman, R. H. (1995). Foundations of music education (2nd ed.). New York: Schirmer Books.
2.
Andrews, J D. W. (1984). Discovery and expository learning compared: Their effects on independent and dependent students. Journal of Educational Research, 78 (2), 80–89.
3.
Apel, W. (1972). Harvard dictionary of music (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5.
Blake, R. S. (1983). Discovery versus expository instructional strategies and their implications for instruction of hearing impaired post-secondary students. In A. H. Areson & J. J. De Caro (Eds.), Teaching, learning and development (pp. 267–316). Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf.
6.
Bradley, I. L. (1974). Development of aural and visual perception through creative processes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 234–240.
7.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
8.
Carin, A. A. (1993). Teaching science through discovery (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
9.
Carlin, M. B., Ciaccio, L., & Sanders, J. W. (1997). Improving high school students' performance via discovery learning, collaboration, and technology. T.H.E. Journal, 24, 62–65.
10.
Costanza, P., & Russell, T. (1992). Methodologies in music education. In R. Colwell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 498–508). New York: Schirmer Books.
11.
D'Aurelio, G. G. (1973). An investigation of the effects of two teaching strategies on the development of skills in detecting and correcting pitch and rhythm errors by beginning instrumental music students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
12.
Edwards, M. M. (1975). Learning musical concepts by the discovery method. Unpublished master's thesis, Washburn University of Topeka, Topeka, KS.
13.
Gagne, R. M. (1966). Varieties of learning and the concept of discovery. In L. S. Shulman & E. R. Keislar (Eds.), Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal (pp. 135–150). Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.
14.
Griesemer, L. B. (1998). A study to determine the effects of discovery learning techniques on fourth-grade and fifth-grade general music students in classes on sound production and musical instruments. Unpublished master's thesis, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA.
15.
Groeling, C. (1977). A comparison of two methods of teaching instrumental music to fourth grade beginners. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 51, 41–44.
16.
Guthrie, J. T. (1967). Expository instruction versus a discovery method. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58 (1), 45–49.
17.
Heller, R. (1990). The role of hypermedia in education: A look at the research issues. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Summer 1990, 431–441.
18.
Hermann, G. (1969). Learning by discovery: A critical review of studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 38 (1), 58–72.
19.
Hermann, G. (1971). Egrule vs. ruleg teaching methods: Grade, intelligence, and category of learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 39 (3), 22–33.
20.
Higgins, W. (1992). Technology. In R. Colwell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 480–497). New York: Schirmer Books.
21.
Jacka, B. T. (1985). The teaching of defined concepts: A test of Gagne and Briggs' model of instructional design. Journal of Educational Research, 78 (4), 224–227.
22.
Jacobs, G. (1992). Hypermedia and discovery-based learning: A historical perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 113–121.
23.
Kyme, G. (1967a). A study of the development of musicality in the junior high school and the contributions of musical composition to this development, Part II. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 11, 36–45.
24.
Lane, D. S., Fletcher, D. N., & Fletcher, H.J. (1983). Improving conditional syllogism performance of young normal and gifted students with discovery and rule instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (3), 441–449.
25.
Looi, C.-K. (1998). Interactive learning environments for promoting inquiry learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27 (1), 3–22.
26.
Priest, T. L. (1997). Fostering creative and critical thinking in a beginning instrumental music class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
27.
Ray, W. E. (1961). Pupil discovery vs. direct instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 29, 271–280.
28.
Robison, W. I. (1974). The effectiveness of music composition as an aid to musical maturation in fifth-grade beginning wind instrument students. Journal of Band Research, 11 (1), 12–17.
29.
Schoenberg, A. (1967). Fundamentals of music composition. London: Faber and Faber.
30.
Whitlock, F. G. (1979). Discovery learning as a method for changing attitudinal response toward twentieth century music. Unpublished master's thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
31.
Wittrock, M. C. (1963). Verbal stimuli in concept formation: Learning by discovery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54 (4), 183–190.
32.
Wolfe, C. S. (1971). An investigation into the use of composition as a means of achieving musical comprehension in the elementary school general music class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
33.
Worthen, B. R. (1968). Discovery and expository task presentation in elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 59(1, Part 2), 2–13.
