The present study was designed to assess novice teachers* perceptions of timing in music instruction and to identify the aspects of timing that are associated with positive perceptions of instructional pacing. We selected eight 1-3-minute excerpts from teaching-practicum videotapes of four novice teachers teaching in a choral rehearsal, a band rehearsal, and two elementary music classrooms. Each teacher appeared in two excerpts that differed with regard to the pace of instruction depicted in each. Novice teachers (N = 44) viewed the videotaped excerpts and evaluated the pace of instruction along six semantic differential scales: fast—slow; appropriate—inappropriate; tense—relaxed; smooth-uneven; too fast-too slow; good-bad. Subjects discriminated among the faster and slower examples on five of the six evaluation dimensions, and among teachers on all six dimensions. Subjects rated the pace of instruction more positively when the rates of student performance episodes and teacher activity episodes were higher rather than lower, and when the mean durations of teacher and student activity were shorter rather than longer. These variables may function as operational measures of the pace of instruction in music performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barr, R. A. (1973-1974). Instructional pace differences and their effect on reading acquisition. Reading Research (Quarterly, 9, 526–554.
2.
Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Brophy, J. E. (1979). Teacher behavior and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 733–750.
4.
Brophy, J. E. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069–1077.
5.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
6.
Buckner, J. L. J. (1997). Assessment of teacher and student behavior in relation to the accomplishment of performance goals in piano lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
7.
Byo, J. L. (1990). Recognition of intensity contrasts in the gestures of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 157–163.
8.
Byo, J. L. (1994). Tracing the evolution of a research line: The role of sequential patterns in structuring the rehearsal. Journal of the World Association of Symphonic Bands and Ensembles, 1, 67–79.
9.
Campbell, W. J., & Allen, G. L. (1988). Experimentally assessed learning rate as a determinant of performance under self-paced and instructor-paced instruction. Journal of Psychology, 122, 69–78.
10.
Cassidy, J. W. (1990). Effect of intensity training of preservice teachers' instruction accuracy and delivery effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 164–174.
11.
Chilcoat, G. W. (1987). Teacher talk: Keep it clear. Academic Therapy, 22, 263–271.
12.
Coatney, R. P. (1985). The Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study: Further examination of educational implications. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 18, 44–48.
13.
Dahlöff, U. (1971). Ability grouping content validity, and curriculum process analysis.New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1985). The effects of teacher presentation rate and praise on LD students' oral reading performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 295–303.
15.
Delquadri J. C., Greenwood, C. R., Stretton, K., & Hall, R. V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education & Treatment of Children, 6, 225–239.
16.
Duke, R. A. (1987). Observation of applied music instruction: The perceptions of trained and untrained observers. In C. K Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 115–124). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
17.
Duke, R. A. (1991, November). Observation of instructional procedures in music-Documentation of temporal relationships between teacher and student behavior. Research presented at the meeting of the National Association for Music Therapy, San Diego, CA.
18.
Duke, R. A. (1994). Bringing the art of rehearsing into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsal conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30 (1), 78–95.
19.
Duke, R. A., & Blackman, M. D. (1991). The relationship between observers' recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290–297.
20.
Duke, R. A., & Farra, Y (1996). SCRIBE: Simple Computer Recording Interface for Behavioral Evaluation.Austin, TX: Learning and Behavior Resources.
21.
Duke, R. A., & Madsen, C. K. (1991). Proactive versus reactive teaching: Focusing observation on specific aspects of instruction. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 108, 1–14.
22.
Duke, R. A., & Prickett, C. A. (1987). The effect of differentially focused observation on evaluation of instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 27–37.
23.
Englert, C. S. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 38–47.
24.
Good, T. L., Grouws, D. A., & Beckerman, T. M. (1978). Curriculum pacing: Some empirical data in math. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10, 75–81.
25.
Goolsby, T. W. (1997). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286–303.
26.
Greenwood, C. R., Hart, B., Walker, D., & Risley, T (1994). The opportunity to respond and academic performance revisited: A behavioral theory of developmental retardation and its prevention. In R. Gardner, III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, & T A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 213–223). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
27.
Greer, R. D., McCorkle, N., & Williams, G. (1989). A sustained analysis of the behaviors of schooling. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 4, 113–141.
28.
Grobe, R. P., & Pettibone, T. J. (1975). Effect of instructional pace on student attentiveness. Journal of Educational Research, 69, 131–134.
29.
Hawkins, A., Sharpe, T., & Ray, R. (1994). Toward instructional process mea-surability: An interbehavioral field systems perspective. In R. Gardner, III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, & T A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 241–255). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
30.
Hendel, C. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of selected music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 182–203.
31.
Ingham, M., & Greer, R. D. (1992). Functional relationships between supervisors' observations of teachers in observed and generalized settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153–164.
32.
Jellison, J. A., & Wolfe, D. E. (1987). Verbal training effects on teaching units: An exploratory study of music teaching antecedents and consequents. In C. K- Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 135–148). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
33.
Johnson, T F., & Butts, D. P. (1983). The relationship among college science student achievement, engaged time, and personal characteristics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 357–366.
34.
Leach, D. J., & Ingram, K. L. (1989). The effects of information and feedback on teachers' classroom behaviour and students' academic engaged time. Educational Psychology, 9, 167–184.
35.
Lewellen, J. R. (1990). Systematic and effective teaching. High School Journal, 74, 57–63.
36.
Lundgren, U. P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process.Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
37.
Madsen, C. H., Jr., & Madsen, C. K. (1974). Teaching/Discipline: A positive approach for educational development (Expanded second edition for professionals). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
Madsen, C. K. (1996). A matter of time. Unpublished manuscript.
39.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985a). Observation of teacher/student interactions in music: Observer perceptions versus actual events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214.
40.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985b). Perception of approval/disapproval in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 85, 119–130.
41.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1993). Selection and development of prospective music teachers, Journal of Music Teacher Education, 3 (1), 5–11.
42.
Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1989). The relationship of teacher “on-task” to intensity and effective teaching. Canadian Music Educator, 30, 87–94.
43.
Madsen, C. K., & Yarbrough, C. (1980). Competency-based music education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Madsen, C. K., Standley, J. M., Byo, J. L., & Cassidy, J. W. (1992). Assessment of effective teaching by instrumental music student teachers and experts. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 10 (2), 20–24.
45.
Preece, P. F. (1990). Learning and the pace of lessons: A theoretical model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 1–6.
46.
Price, H. E. (1983). The effect of conductor academic task presentation, conductor reinforcement, and ensemble practice on performers' musical achievement, attentiveness, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 245–257.
47.
Price, H. E., & Yarbrough, C. (1991). Validation of sequential patterns of instruction in music. Canadian Music Educator [Research Edition], 33, 165–174.
48.
Prickett, C. A., & Duke, R. A. (1992). Evaluation of music instruction by musicians and nonmusicians assigned differential observation tasks. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 41–50.
49.
Roberts, M. S. (1989). Student selection of deadline conditions in a personalized psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 128–130.
50.
Ross, L. L., & McBean, D. (1995). A comparison of pacing contingencies in class using a personalized system of instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 87–88.
51.
Siebenaler, D. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of children and adults. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6–20.
52.
Standley, J. M., & Greenfield, D. G. (1987). The effect of a focused observation task and its transfer on the analysis of a kindergarten music class by pre-senior versus pre-internship music education/therapy majors. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 99–114). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
53.
Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. R. (1983). How much “opportunity to respond” does the minority disadvantaged student receive in school?Exceptional Children, 49, 370–373.
54.
Wakshlag, J. J., Day, K. D., & Zillmann, D. (1981). Selective exposure to educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 27–32.
55.
Yarbrough, C. (1988). Pacing and content in music teaching. Proceedings of Current Issues in Music Education Symposium, Ohio State University, 13, 9–28.
56.
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209–217.
57.
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1989). Sequential patterns of instruction in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 179–187.
58.
Younger-Flores, K. (1995, April). Comparison of a computer assisted systematic observation instrument to independent, global measures of instructional effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
59.
Zillman, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (2), 170–180.
