Abstract
This investigation compared three methods of teaching keyboard sight-reading to undergraduate music majors. Sixty-nine students enrolled in six piano classes were randomly divided among three conditions: (1) error-detection practice plus “shadowing” (silently playing the notes on top of the keys), (2) shadowing only, and (3) unguided independent practice (contact control). A pretest-posttest design was used to assess subjects' achievement on five selected sight-reading assignments during the course of one academic semester (15 weeks). Individual pretest and posttest performances were tape-recorded and evaluated across three error categories: rhythm, notes, and hesitations. Results indicated that, while no significant differences were found in overall sight-reading improvement among groups, the EDS (error-detection plus shadowing) subjects achieved modest overall gains, and rhythm was the most improved category, followed by notes and hesitations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
