Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine qualitative differences between experts and novice listeners of various ages in (a) the process of integrating pitch and rhythm information to form a single judgment of similarity or difference and (b) the perceptual value of certain pitch and rhythm transformations when they occur simultaneously. Differences were described using an integration theory model of the perceptual process. A sample of 69 subjects was divided among four novice groups taken from Grades 1, 5, 8, and college and a group of upper-level college music majors. Subjects' perception of the degree of difference between a theme and nine variations was tested using the author-designed Pitch/Rhythm Integration Measure (PRIM), a multidimensional measure of musical perception. Results indicate that (a) the PRIM was a reliable measure; (b) the pitch/rhythm integration process is statistically the same for all the groups studied; (c) there is a significant age-related increase in the importance of rhythm for the perceptual judgments of novices from Grade 1 to adult. The results seem significant in relation to previous research in musical perception and development and pitch and rhythm experiences in elementary music education.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

Bartholomew, D. (1987). Problems with Piagetian conservation and musical objects. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 27–40.

Demorest, S. M. (1989). An information integration approach to modeling developmental differences in musical cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin—Madison.

Deutsch, D. (1982). The processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 271–316). New York: Academic Press.

Dowling, W. J. (1972). Recognition of melodic transformations: Inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 417–421.

Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341–354.

Dowling, W. J. (1982). Melodic information processing and its development. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 412–428). New York: Academic Press.

Dowling, W.J. , & Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the A coustical Society of America, 49, 524–531.

10.

Dowling, W. J. , & Harwood, D. L. (1986). Music cognition. New York: Academic Press.

11.

Duke, R. A. (1989). Effect of melodic rhythm on elementary students' and college undergraduates' perceptions of relative tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 246–257.

12.

Duke, R. A. , Geringer, J. M. , & Madsen, C. K. (1988). Effect of tempo on pitch perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 108–125.

13.

Gordon, E. E. (1965). Musical aptitude profile. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

14.

Kuhn, T. L. (1987). The effect of tempo, meter and melodic complexity on the perception of tempo. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 165–174). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

15.

Madsen, C. K. (1979). Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 57–67.

16.

Pflederer, M. (1964). The responses of children to musical tasks embodying Piaget's principle of conservation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 12, 251–268.

17.

Seashore, C. E. , Lewis, L. , & Saetveit, J. G. (1960). Seashore Measures of Musical Talents. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

18.

Serafine, M. L. (1980). Piagetian research in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 62, 1–21.

19.

Serlin, R. C. , Carr, J. , & Marascuilo, L. A. (1982). A measure of association for selected non-parametric procedures. Pychological Bulletin, 92, 786–790.

20.

Sink, P. E. (1983). Effects of rhythmic and melodic alterations on rhythm perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 101–113.

21.

Wang, C. C. (1984). Effects of some aspects of rhythm on tempo perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 169–176.

22.

Webster, P. R. , & Zimmerman, M. P. (1983). Conservation of rhythmic and tonal patterns of second through sixth grade children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 73, 28–49.

23.

Wing, H. D. (1961). Standardized tests of musical intelligence. The Mere, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.

24.

Zimmerman, M. P. (1985). State of the art in early childhood music and research. In The young child and music: Contemporary principles in child development and music education (pp. 65-78). Proceedings of the Music in Early Childhood Conference.

25.

Zimmerman, M. P. , & Sechrest, L. (1970). Brief focused instruction and musical concepts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18, 25–36.

Information Integration Theory: An Approach to the Study of Cognitive Development in Music

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References