Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Music education researchers have found biological sex to be in important determinant of whether elementary students persevere in musical instrument training. Psychological sex type may also play an important role. A sample of 108 students from two elementary schools completed the Children's Sex Role Inventory (Boldizar, 1991) and, following a presentation of nine typical band instruments, completed a survey assessing most- and least-preferred instruments. Results showed that masculine sex-typed students preferred, masculine-stereotyped instruments, feminine sex-typed students preferred feminine-stereotyped instruments, and androgynous students preferred neutral instruments. The converse pattern was obtained for least-preferred instruments, with the exception that androgynous children disliked both categories of sex-typed instruments. These results suggest that to enhance retention in musical instrument education, children's psychosocial identity ought to be considered.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeles, H. E , & Porter, S. Y. (1978). The sex-stereotyping of musical instruments. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 65–75.

Ber, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sex typing and androgyny in children: The children's sex role inventory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 505–515.

Byo, J . (1991). An assessment of musical instrument preferences of third-grade children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 110, 21–32.

Coffman, D. D. , & Sehmann, K. H. (1989). Musical instrument preference: Implications for music educators. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 7(2), 32–34.

Deaux, K . (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81.

Delzell, J. K. , & Leppla, D. A. (1992). Gender association of musical instruments and preferences of fourth-grade students for selected instruments. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 93–103.

Doyle, J. A. , & Paludi, M. A. (1995). Sex and gender: The human experience. Madison, WI: William C. Brown.

Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.

10.

Finnas, L . (1989). How can musical preferences be modified? A research review. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 102, 1–58.

11.

Fortney, P. M. , Boyle, J. D. , & DeCarbo, N. J. (1993). A study of middle school band students' instrument choices. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 28–39.

12.

Geringer, J. M. (1977). An assessment of children's musical instrument preferences. Journal of Music Therapy, 4, 172–179.

13.

Golombok, S ., & Fivush, R. (1994). Gender development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Griswold, P. A. , & Chroback, D. A. (1981). Sex-role associations of music instruments and occupations by gender and major. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 57–62.

15.

Hare-Mustin, R. T. , & Marecek, J. (Eds.). (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

16.

Harter, S. L. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.

17.

Idle, T. , Wood, E. , & Desmarais, S. (1993). Gender role socialization in toy play situations: Mothers and fathers with their sons and daughters. Sex Roles, 28, 679–691.

18.

Karraker, K. H. , Vogel, D. A. , & Lake, M. A. (1995). Parents' gender-stereotyped perceptions of newborns: The eye of the beholder revisited. Sex Roles, 33, 687–701.

19.

Kuhn, T. L. (1980). Instrumentation for the measurement of music attitudes. Contributions to Music Education, 8, 2–38.

20.

Maccoby, E. E. (1988). Gender as a social category. Developmental Psychology, 24, 755–765.

21.

Perry, L. C. , Perry, D. G. , & Hynes, J. (1990). The relation of sex-typing to the outcomes children expect for sex-typed behavior Unpublished manuscript, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.

22.

Wapnick, J . (1976). A review of research on attitude and preference. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 48, 1–20.

23.

Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology. Volume II: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Psychological Sex Type and Preferences for Musical Instruments in Fourth and Fifth Graders

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References