Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

One hundred and thirty-six theory students participated in a melodic dictation experiment. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of six dictation strategy groups contrasted by simultaneous writing, concentration before notation, and singing before writing. The task within the experiment consisted of notating 12 melodies presented aurally. Strategies were combined across single and dual melodic presentations to see if any of three methods were significantly more effective regardless of the number of presentations. Results of the analysis revealed no significant differences (.05) among the strategies. When the six groups were analyzed individually, significantly higher scores were revealed for Groups 4 (writing while hearing the melody twice) and 5 (writing after hearing the melody twice). Overall, written response accuracy for the six groups was 48%. Subjects in groups that sang reproduced the melodies at a 43% level of correctness. Their written responses matched their vocal responses 61 % of the time.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benward, B . (1961). Teacher's dictation manual in ear training. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.

Conner, A. O. (1970). The perception of musical intervals: The theory of property arrays. Council for Research in Music Education, 20, 38–42.

Cuddy, L . (1982). From tone to melody to music: Some directions for a theory of musical cognition. Council for Research in Music Education, 71, 15–29.

Deutsch, D . (1975). The organization of short-term memory for a single acoustic attribute. In D. Detusch & J. A. Deutsch (Eds.), Short-term memory (pp. 108–151). New York: Academic Press.

Deutsch, D . (1982). The influence of melodic context on pitch recognition judgement. Perception and Pschophysics, 31 (5), 407–410.

Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85 (4), 341–354.

Edlund, L . (1963). Modus novus: Studies in reading atonal melodies. London: J. W. Chester.

Herder, R . (1973). Tonal/atonal; Progressive ear training, singing, and dictation studies in diatonic, chromatic, and atonal music. New York: Continue Music Press.

Hicks, C. R. (1973). Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

10.

Hofstetter, F. T. (1981). Computer-based recognition of perceptual patterns and learning styles in rhythmic dictation exercises. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(4), 265–277.

11.

Holly, K. M., Jr. (1980). An experimental investigation of the effects of selected factors on the short-term retention of pitch sequences. Council for Research in Music Education, 63, 48–51.

12.

Larsen, R. L. (1973). Levels of conceptual development in melodic permutation concepts based on Piaget's theory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21(3), 256–263.

13.

Long, P. A. (1977). Relationships between pitch memory in short melodies and selected factors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25(4), 272–282.

14.

Madsen, C. K. , & Staum, M. J. (1983). Discrimination and interference in the recall of melodic stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 15–31.

15.

McGaughey, J. M. (1961). Practical ear training. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

16.

McHose, A. I. , & Tibbs, R. N. (1945). Sight singing manual. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

17.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

18.

Moog, H . (1982). The foundations of musical learning through hearing: A contribution towards a learning theory of music. Psychology of Music, Proceedings of the Ninth International Seminar on Research in Music Education.

19.

Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

20.

Neisser, U . (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

21.

Neisser, U. , Hirst, W. , & Spelke, E. S. (1981). Limited capacity theories and the notion of automaticity: Reply to Lucas and Bub. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(4), 499–500.

22.

Ortmann, O. O. (1934). Problems in the elements of ear dictation. Baltimore: Peabody Conservatory of Music.

23.

Pembrook, R. G. (1983, February). The effects of contour, length, and tonality on melodic memory. Paper presented at the Southeast Regional Meeting of the Music Educators National Conference, Louisville, KY.

24.

Sink, P. E. (1983). Effects of rhythmic and melodic alterations on rhythmic perception. Journal for Research in Music Education, 31(2), 101–113.

25.

Tallarico, P. T. (1974). A study of the three phase concept of memory: Its musical implications. Council for Research in Music Education, 39, 1–15.

26.

Taylor, J. A. (1976). Perception of tonality in short melodies. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24(4), 197–208.

27.

Trubitt, A. R. , & Hines, R. S. (1979). Ear training & sight-singing: An integrated approach. New York: MacMillan.

28.

Williams, D. B. (1975). Short-term retention of pitch sequence, Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(1), 53–66.

Interference of the Transcription Process and Other Selected Variables on Perception and Memory During Melodic Dictation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References