Children ages 7 to 15 and adults were asked to detect changes in an unaccompanied drumbeat that either increased, decreased, or maintained the same tempo across measures. Marked differences in performance as a function of age were found for the change trials, older subjects being more accurate, while musical training was relatively unimportant. For trials in which the beat remained constant, however, subjects with musical training were more accurate, while age, by itself, had little effect upon performance. A multiprocess model for the perception of tempo is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Geringer, J. M., & Madsen, C. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded orchestral music among musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 194–204.
2.
Gibson, E. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development.New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
3.
Gilbert, J. (1979). Assessment of motoric music skill development in young children: Test construction and evaluation procedures. Psychology of Music, 7, 3–11.
4.
Goldstone, S., Boardman, W. K., & Lhamon, W. T. (1958). Kinesthetic cues in the development of time concepts. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 93, 185–190.
5.
Kraut, A. G. (1976). Effects of familiarization on alertness and encoding in children. Developmental Psychology, 12, 491–496.
6.
Kraut, A. G., & Smothergill, D. W. (1978). A two-factor theory of stimulus-repetition affects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 191–197.
7.
Kuhn, T. (1974). Discrimination of modulated beat tempo by professional musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 270–277.
8.
Kuhn, T. (1987). The effect of tempo, meter, and melodic complexity on the perception of tempo. In C. Madsen & C. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 165–175). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
9.
Kuhn, T., & Gates, E. (1975). Effect of notational values, age, and example length on tempo performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 203–210.
10.
Lass, N., West, L., & Taft, D. (1973). A non-verbal analogue to the verbal transformation effect. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 272–279.
11.
Madsen, C. K. (1979). Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 57–67.
12.
Madsen, C. K., Edmonson, F., & Madsen, C. H. (1969). Modulated frequency discrimination in relationship to age and musical training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 1468–1472.
13.
Moog, H. (1976). The musical experience of the preschool child (C. Clark, Trans.). London: Schott.
14.
Siddle, D., Stephenson, D., & Spinks, J. (1983). Elicitation and habituation of the orienting response. In D. Siddle (Ed.), Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research (pp. 109–182). New York, Wiley.
15.
Sokolov, E. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex.Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
16.
Thompson, R., & Spencer, W. (1966). Habituation: A model for the study of the neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review, 73, 16–43.
17.
Wang, C. C. (1983). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by music majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 49–55.
18.
Wang, C. C. (1984). Effects of some aspects of rhythm on tempo perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 169–176.
19.
Wang, C. C., & Salzberg, R. S. (1984). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by string students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 123–131.
20.
Williams, H. M. (1933). A study in the perception of motor rhythmic performance of school children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 43, 377–388.
21.
Yarbrough, C. (1987). The effects of musical excerpts on tempo discriminations and preferences of musicians and non-musicians. In C. Madsen & C. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 175–190). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
