The present study examined evaluations by observers directed to attend to specific aspects of one-to-one instruction in applied music. One hundred forty-three nonmusic education majors enrolled in music study observed one of three videotaped versions of an 11-minute private lesson in violin. Visual presentation and observation instructions focused subjects' attention toward 1) the student, 2) the teacher, or 3) both student and teacher. Subjects evaluated 10 aspects of the lesson and estimated the frequency of approval and disapproval feedback. There were significant differences (p < .05) in the evaluations of teacher attitude and student attitude among the three presentation conditions, with subjects rating less positively the individual to whom attention was directed. Group mean estimations of disapproval frequency were also significantly different (p < .002), with subjects who were directed to observe teacher behavior estimating a greater number of teacher disapproval responses. In addition, analyses of subjects' written observations indicated considerable within-group variability concerning the perception of events. This information seems important in relation to the structuring of observation experiences for preservice teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bond, M. H. (1972). Effects of impression set on subsequent behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 301–305.
2.
Brown, A. & Alley, J. M. (1983). Multivariate analysis of degree persistence of undergraduate music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 271–281.
3.
Duke, R. A. (1983, March). The effects of laboratory and field-based teacher training on observation and teacher responses. Research presented at the meeting of the Music Educators National Conference Southern Division, Louisville, Kentucky.
4.
Duke, R. A. (in press). Observation of applied music instruction: The perceptions of trained and untrained observers. In C. K. Madsen and C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
5.
Eisen, S. V., & McArthur, L. Z. (1978). Evaluation and sentencing of a defendant as a function of the defendant's salience and the observer's set. Unpublished manuscript, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
6.
Erber, R., & Fiske, S. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709–726.
7.
Jones, E. E. & Goethals, G. R. (1972). Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context and the nature of the entity. In E. E. Jones et al. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
8.
Jones, E. E., Goethals, G. R., Kennington, G. E., & Severance, L. J. (1972). Primacy and assimilation in the attribution process: The stable entity proposition. Journal of Personality, 40, 250–274.
9.
Jones, E. E., & Thibaut, J. W. (1958). Interaction goals as bases of inference in interpersonal perception. In R. Tiaguri and C. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 151–178.
10.
Jones, E. E., Worchel, S. Goethals, G. R., & Grumet, J. E. (1971). Prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 59–80.
11.
Kostka, M. J. (1984). An investigation of reinforcements, time use, and student attentiveness in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 113–122.
12.
Madsen, C. H., & Madsen, C. K. (1983). Teaching/discipline: A positive approach to educational development.Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing Co.
13.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985a). Observation of teacher/student interactions in music: Observer perceptions versus actual events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214.
14.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985b). Perception of approval/disapproval in music. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin, 85, 119–130.
15.
Manstead, A. S., Wagner, H. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (1984). Face, body, and speech as channels of communication in the detection of deception. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 317–332.
16.
Marmurek, H. H. (1984). Dispositional-based categories: Structure and salience information. Journal of Research on Personality, 18, 179–194.
17.
Martin, D. S., & Huang, M. (1984). Effects of time and perceptual orientations on actors' and observers' attributions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 23–30.
18.
Miller, A. G. (1976). Constraint and target effects on the attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 325–339.
19.
Moore, R. S. (1976). The effects of videotaped feedback and self-evaluation forms on teaching skills, musicianship, and creativity of prospective elementary teachers. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin, 47, 1–7.
20.
Murphy, K. R., Balzer, W. K., Lockhart, M. C., & Eisenman, E.J. (1985). Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 72–84.
21.
Rosenthal, R. (1969). Interpersonal expectations: Effects of the experimenter's hypothesis. In R. Rosenthal & R. Rosnow, (Eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research, New York: Academic Press, 181–277.
22.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
23.
Ross, L. D., Bierbrauer, G., & Polly, S. (1974). Attribution of educational outcomes by professional and nonprofessional instructors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 609–618.
24.
Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. J., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception, 2nd ed. Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 249.
25.
Sherrod, D. R., & Farber, J. (1975). The effect of previous actor/observer role experience in attribution of responsibility for failure. Journal of Personality, 43, 231–247.
26.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.
27.
Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. (1978). Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 941–950.
28.
Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165–175.
29.
Wegner, D. M., & Finstuen, K. (1977). Observers' focus of attention in the simulation of self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 56–62.
30.
Weiner, B. (1985). “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74–84.
31.
Winter, L., & Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237–252.
32.
Zadney, J., & Gerard, H. B. (1974). Attributed intentions and informational selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 34–52.
