Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The author investigated the effects of three syllabic recitation systems on skills associated with the ability to read rhythm notation. Subjects were 160 second- and third-grade children enrolled in public schools in southern Maine. Twelve rhythm patterns containing half, quarter, eighth, and sixteenth notes were used. Random combinations of the twelve patterns were combined into complete measures of 4/4 or 6/8. Subjects were tested on their ability to recognize, write, and clap these patterns. Evaluation of these three skills was based on experimenter-designed tests, and a pretest-posttest experimental design was used. Results showed that a syllabic system that differentiated between duple and triple subdivisions of the beat improved recognition skills to a greater degree than one that did not. Furthermore, a system in which specific words were assigned to intact rhythm patterns improved performance and notation skills to a greater degree than did the two systems that used monosyllables.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bebeau, M. J. (1982). Effects of traditional and simplified methods of rhythm-reading instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30(2), 107–119.

Boyle, D. J. (1970). The effect of prescribed rhythmical movements on the ability to read music at sight. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18(4), 307–309.

Brown, M. (1974). Letters, syllables, numbers, intervals. Music Educators Journal, 61(3), 52.

Cheyette, I. (1953). On teaching rhythmic reading. Educational Music Magazine, 33, 25–24.

Choksy, L. (1981). The Kodály context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Cobb, H. (1962). Rhythm-Easy as pie. Clavier, 1(1), 18.

Gibbs, A. (1973). Come on Chelsea. Music Teacher, 52, 27.

Gordon, E. E. (1971). The psychology of music teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Gordon, E. E. (1980). Learning sequences in music: Skill, content, and patterns. Chicago: G.I.A. Publications.

10.

Heffernan, C. (1968). Teaching children to read music New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

11.

Hicks, C. E. (1980). Sound before sight-Strategies for teaching music reading. Music Educators Journal, 66(8), 53–54.

12.

Landis, B. , & Carder, P. (1972). The eclectic curriculum in American music education: Contributions of Dalcroze, Kodály, and Orff. Washington, DC: Music Educators National Conference.

13.

Nash, G. (1974). Creative approaches to child development with music, language, and movement New York: Alfred.

14.

Orff, C. , & Keetman, G. (1957). Music for children: I-Pentatonic London: Schott & Co.

15.

Palmer, M. (1976). Relative effectiveness of two approaches to rhythmic reading for fourth grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24(3), 110–119.

16.

Radocy, R. E. , & Boyle, J. D. (1979). Psychological foundations of musical behavior. Springfield, EL: Charles C. Thomas.

17.

Reichenthal, E. (1960). “French time names.” In Archie Jones (Ed.), Music education in action (pp. 319–324). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

18.

Siemens, M. T. (1969). A comparison of Orff and traditional instructional methods in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 17(3), 272–285.

19.

Van Zee, N. (1976). Responses of kindergarten children to musical stimuli and terminology. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24(1), 14–22.

20.

Walker, R. (1981). Teaching basic musical concepts and their staff notations through cross-modal matching symbols. Psychology of Music, 9(1), 31–38.

21.

Winslow, R. W. , & Dallin, L. (1975). Music skills for classroom teachers (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

22.

Zimmerman, M. , & Sechrest, L. (1968). How children conceptually organize musical sounds (USOE Cooperative Research Project No. 5–0256). Chicago: Northwestern University.

A Comparison of Syllabic Methods for Improving Rhythm Literacy

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References