This investigation was a survey of natural rates and ratios of reinforcements, time use, student attentiveness, and interruptions of student performance in 96 private piano lessons. Forty-eight teachers and two students per teacher voluntarily participated with student age ranging from preschool to older adult. Intervallic observation procedures were used with an observation form adapted for this investigation; pilot-testing of the form resulted in interobserver reliability of .85. Results indicated that student age was a significant factor in observed differences among twelve selected variables. Elementary students (preschool through grade 6) received highest rates and ratios of approvals, secondary students (grades 7 through 12) spent more lesson time in student performance, and adults (high school graduates to adults of retirement age) were most on-task during lessons. All students were on-task for at least 85% of the lesson time. The survey found that lesson time was largely divided between student performance and teacher instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barmann, B., Barmann, C., & McLain, B. (1980). The use of contingent-interrupted music in the treatment of disruptive bus-riding behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 693–698.
2.
Dennis, C. (1975). The conditioning of a pitch response using uncertain singers. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 139–150). New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
Dorow, L. (1977). The effect of teacher approval/disapproval ratios on student music selection and concert attentiveness.Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 32–44.
4.
Forsythe, J. (1975). The effect of teacher approval, disapproval, and errors on student attentiveness: Music versus classroom teachers. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 49–55). New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Forsythe, J. (1977). Elementary student attending behavior as a function of classroom activities.Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 228–239.
6.
Geringer, J. (1977). An assessment of children's musical instrument preferences.Journal of Music Therapy, 14, 172–179.
7.
Greenwald, M. (1978). The effectiveness of distorted music versus interrupted music to decrease self-stimulatory behaviors in profoundly retarded adults.Journal of Music Therapy, 15, 58–66.
8.
Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists (pp. 578–614). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
9.
Kostka, M. (1983, February). Developing a reliable method of assessing private piano lessons. Paper presented at the Texas Music Educators Convention, San Antonio, TX.
10.
Kuhn, T. (1975). The effect of teacher approval and disapproval on attentiveness, musical achievement, and attitude of fifth grade students. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 40–48). New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Madsen, C. H., Jr., & Madsen, C. K. (1981). Teaching/discipline: A positive approach for educational development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
12.
Madsen, C. K., & Alley, J. (1979). The effect of reinforcement on attentiveness: A comparison of behaviorally trained music therapists and other professionals with implications for competency-based academic preparation.Journal of Music Therapy, 26, 70–82.
13.
Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. (1983). Attending behavior as a function of in-class activity in university music classes.Journal of Music Therapy, 20, 30–38.
14.
Madsen, C. K., & Madsen, C. H., Jr. (1972). Selection of music listening or candy as a function of contingent versus noncontingent reinforcement and scale singing.Journal of Music Therapy, 9, 190–198.
15.
Madsen, C. K., & Wolfe, D. (1979). The effect of interrupted music and incompatible responses on bodily movement and music attentiveness.Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 17–30.
16.
Moore, R. (1976, November). Videotaped comparisons of beginning versus experienced music specialists in the use of teaching time: Developing and piloting the Music Teaching Interactions-Activities Form. Paper presented at the Second National Symposium on Research in Music Behavior, Milwaukee, WI.
17.
Moore, R. (1981). Comparative use of teaching time by American and British elementary music specialists. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 66-67, 62–68.
18.
Murray, K. (1975). The effect of teacher approval/disapproval on musical performance, attentiveness, and attitude of high school choruses. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 165–180). New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
Porter, S. (1977). The effect of multiple discrimination training on pitch-matching behaviors of uncertain singers.Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 68–82.
20.
Wagner, M., & Strul, E. (1979). Comparisons of beginning versus experienced elementary music educators in the use of teaching time.Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 113–125.
21.
Wolfe, D. (1980). The effect of automated interrupted music on head posturing of cerebral palsied individuals.Journal of Music Therapy, 17, 184–206.
22.
Yarbrough, C. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses.Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134–146.
23.
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity and teacher behavior.Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209–218.
