Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how directors determine grades for students in high school band and choral classes and how the directors' grading systems compare with grading systems proposed by principals. Data were obtained from responses to questionnaires sent to band directors, choral directors, and principals at 98 randomly selected Illinois high schools.

Results showed that directors relied most heavily on nonmusic criteria to determine grades; psychomotor criteria related to performance were the next most heavily weighted, followed by affective and cognitive criteria. In contrast, the principals' proposed grading systems assigned the greatest weight to psychomotor criteria, followed by nonmusic, cognitive, and affective criteria. Analyses of variance revealed significant differences (p > .05) between the two groups of directors and principals: Principals placed more weight on cognitive criteria and on basic performance technique and less weight on attendance at concerts and behavior than did directors. Directors with 5 or more years' experience placed more weight on psychomotor criteria than did directors with fewer than 5 years of experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeles, H. F. (1973). Development and validation of a clarinet performance adjudication scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21, 246–255.

Adler, M. (1982). The Paideia proposal: An educational manifesto. New York, Macmillan.

Bartlett, L. (1987). Academic evaluation and student discipline don't mix: A critical review. Journal of Law and Education, 16, 155–165.

Bennett, W. J. (1987). James Madison High School: A curriculum for American students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Bergee, M.J. (1988). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for euphonium and tuba music performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1987), Dissertation Abstracts International, 496, 1086A.

Bowman, S. E. , Calahan, G. L. , Colwell, R. , Drummond, R. , Dubash, F. , Formo, P. , Pucciani, L. , Stupak, R. T. , & Hickey, W. (1984). Point of view: Grading performing groups. Music Educators Journal, 70(7), 59–62.

Boyle, J. D. , & Radocy, R. E. (1987). Measurement and evaluation of music experiences. New York: Schirmer Books.

Branum, K. , Fusco, L. , Haag, R. , Richmond, F. , & Russo, M. D. (1988). Idea bank: Evaluating music students. Music Educators Journal, 75(2), 38–41.

Bryant, W. D. (1987). The importance of objectives for secondary school music programs and the opinions of five school related groups (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 3348A–3349A

10.

College Entrance Examination Board. (1985). Academic preparation in the arts: Teaching for transition from high school to college. New York: Author.

11.

Colwell, R. (1970). The evaluation of music teaching and learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

12.

Cooksey, J. M. (1977). A facet-factorial approach to rating high school choral music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 100–114.

13.

Drake, A H. (1984). A survey of music performing group grading practices in N.A.S.M. member colleges and universities in Ohio and four neighboring states. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 78, 33–37.

14.

Ellis, M. C. (1985). Music testing. In P. W. Miller & H. E. Erickson (Eds.), Teacher-written tests (pp. 53–55). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

15.

Ellis, M. C. (1991). Attitudes of Iowa band directors toward cognitive learning in band performance classes. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 15(1), 1–10.

16.

Fowler, C. (1987, May). Reason vs. emotion. Musical America, pp. 34–36.

17.

Getty Center for Education in the Arts. (1985). Beyond creating: The place for art in America's schools. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Trust

18.

Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

19.

Jones, H. (1986). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school vocal solo performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1230A.

20.

Lamble, W. H. (1982). The development and evaluation of a model minimum competency testing program in high school choral music (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 1075A.

21.

Lehman, P. R. (1987). A balanced testing program includes the arts. Design in Arts Education, 88, 33–36.

22.

McCoy, C. W. (1988). An exploratory study of grading criteria among select Ohio ensemble directors. Contributions to Music Education, 15, 15–19.

23.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Stock No. 065-000-00177-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

24.

National Endowment for the Arts. (1988). Toward civilization: A report on arts education. Stock No. 036-000-00051-1. Washington, DC: Author.

25.

Nichols, J. P. (1986) A factor-analysis approach to the development of a rating scale for snare drum performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 3282A.

26.

Wemuth, R. W. (1986). The development and evaluation of a cognitive music achievement test to evaluate Missouri high school choral music students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 4316A. (University Microfilms No. ADG87-06495)

27.

Wilson, B. (1987). Testing and the process of change. Design for Arts in Education, 88, 6–11.

Grading Students in Performing Groups: A Comparison of Principals' Recommendations with Directors' Practices

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References