Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the ability to learn relative pitch-perception, and how it is affected by age, frequency, and ear. Thirty-four musically naive subjects were assigned to four age groups and taught individually, over a period of five daily sessions, to adjust the frequency of a variable stimulus to be twice the frequency of (or an octave higher than) a specified reference stimulus. Three-octave intervals were learned in this manner with either the left or right ear. Results indicated no age or ear difference in amount of accuracy attained. The octave interval 1000–2000 Hz appeared significantly more difficult to estimate accurately than the octave intervals 400–800 Hz or 1500–3000 Hz, however. The youngest age group learned the task with maximum accuracy more quickly than the older age groups. There was, furthermore, a significant ear difference in how quickly the task was learned. This difference, however, was frequency-dependent.

Keywords

acoustics age aural discrimination learning theory memory music achievement tests.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American National Standards Institute. Specifications for Audiometers, ANSI S3.6, 1969. New York: American National Standards Institute, 1969.

Bachem, A. Various types of absolute pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1937, 9, 146–151.

Bachem, A. Absolute pitch, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 1180–1195.

Baird, J. W. Memory for absolute pitch. Studies in Psychology, Titchener Commemorative Volume. Worcester, Mass.: L. N. Wilson, 1917.

Copp, E. F. Musical ability. Journal of Heredity, 1916, 7, 297–305.

Gordon, H. W. Hemispheric asymmetry in the perception of musical chords. Cortex, 1970, 6, 387–398.

Hartman, E. B. The influence of practice and pitch-distance between tones on the absolute identification of pitch. American Journal of Psychology, 1954, 67, 1–14.

Keppel, G. Design and analysis: A researcher' s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

Kimura, D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 16, 355–358.

10.

Kirk, R. E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1968.

11.

Long, P. A. Relationships between pitch memory in short melodies and selected factors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1977, 25, 273–282.

12.

Lundin, R. W. , & Allen, J. D. A technique for training perfect pitch. Psychological Record, 1962, 12, 139–146.

13.

Meyer, M.

Is the memory of absolute pitch capable of development by training?

Psychological Review, 1899, 6, 514–516.

14.

Mull, H. K. The acquisition of absolute pitch. American Journal of Psychology, 1925, 36, 469–493.

15.

Oakes, W. F. An experimental study of pitch naming and pitch discrimination reactions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1955, 86, 237–259.

16.

Petran, L. An experimental study of pitch recognition. Psychology Monographs, 1932, 42, No. 193, 1–124.

17.

Rushford-Murray, K. Left-right ear differences in the processing of instrument tone segments. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 1977, 52, 1–7.

18.

Van Krevelen, A. The ability to make absolute judgments of pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951, 42, 207–215.

19.

Ward, E. W. Absolute pitch. Part II. Sound, 1963, 2, 33–42.

20.

Watt, H. J. The psychology of sound. Cambridge, England: University Press, 1917.

21.

Wedell, C. H. The nature of absolute judgment of pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1934, 17, 485–503.

Acquiring Relative Pitch Perception as a Function of Age

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References