To examine the effects of interorganizational network structures on acquisition decisions, we propose a model whereby firms learn by sampling the diverse experiences of their network partners. We tested this model by examining the effect of diversity of network partners' experience on firms' acquisition decisions, using data on acquisition premiums and acquirers' stock market performance from 1986 to 1997. Results show that firms tied to others with heterogeneous prior premium experience tend to pay less for their acquisitions and have better-performing acquisitions than those tied to others with homogeneous experience. Firms also pay lower premiums when their network partners (1) have completed deals of diverse sizes, (2) have unique information, and (3) are themselves of diverse sizes. Firms that have multiplex relationships with their partners receive even more benefit. The results extend prior research on networks and learning by showing that collective network experience affects firms' decision quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonP. D.: 1978“Measures of inequality.”American Sociological Review, 43: 865–880.
2.
AnconaD.CaldwellD.: 1992“Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance.”Organization Science, 3: 321–341.
BeckmanC. M.: 1999“Learning from difference: The effects of interorganizational networks on organizational learning.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
5.
BonacichP.: 1987“Power and centrality: A family of measures.”American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1170–1182.
6.
BurnsL. W.WholeyD. W.: 1993“Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks.”Academy of Management Journal, 36: 106–138.
7.
BurtR. S.: 1992Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C.: 1966Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Canada NewsWire: 2000“Cognos expands board, appoints two new members.” April 6.
10.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.: 1979Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
CronbachL.: 1987“Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed.”Psychological Bulletin, 102: 414–417.
12.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.: 1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
13.
DavisG. F.: 1991“Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583–613.
14.
DavisG. F.: 1996“The significance of board interlocks for corporate governance.”Corporate Governance, 4: 154–159.
15.
DavisG. F.GreveH. R.: 1997“Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s.”American Journal of Sociology, 103: 1–37.
16.
DenrellJ.: 1999“The myths of management: Organizational learning and the illusion of validity.” Working paper, Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.
17.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.: 1983“The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.”American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
18.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E.: 1984Social Cognition. New York: Random House.
19.
FreemanL. C.: 1979“Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification.”Social Networks, 1: 215–239.
20.
GalaskiewiczJ.WassermanS.: 1989“Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 454–479.
21.
GranovetterM.: 1985“Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
22.
GulatiR.: 1995“Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619–652.
23.
HaleblianJ.FinkelsteinS.: 1999“The influence of organization acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 29–56.
24.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A.: 1984“Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.”Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.
25.
HamelG.: 1991“Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances.”Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83–103.
26.
HansenM.: 1999“The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82–111.
27.
HaspeslaghP. C.JemisonD. B.: 1991Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value through Corporate Renewal. New York: Free Press.
28.
HaunschildP. R.: 1993“Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 564–592.
29.
HaunschildP. R.: 1994“How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 391–411.
30.
HaunschildP. R.BeckmanC. M.: 1998“When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 815–844.
31.
HaunschildP. R.NiB.: 2000“Learning from complexity: Effects of airline accident/incident heterogeneity on subsequent accident/incident rates.” Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management.
32.
HaywardM. L. A.HambrickD. C.: 1997“Explaining the premium paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 103–127.
33.
HeckmanJ. J.BorjasG. J.: 1980“Does unemployment cause future unemployment: Definitions, questions, and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence.”Econometrica, 47: 247–283.
34.
JehnK.NorthcraftG.NealeM.: 1999“Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741–763.
35.
JohnsonR. A.HoskissonR. E.HittM. A.: 1993“Board of director involvement in restructuring: The effects of board versus managerial controls and characteristics.”Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33–50.
36.
KaplanS. N.: 1989“Campeau's acquisition of Federated: Value destroyed or value added?”Journal of Financial Economics, 25: 191–212.
37.
KimJ.MinerA. S.: 2000“Crash test without dummies: A longitudinal study of interorganizational learning from failure experience in the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1984–1998.” Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management.
38.
KrackhardtD.: 1992“The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations.” In NohriaN.EcclesR. G. (eds.), Networks and Organizations: 216–239. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
KraatzM. S.: 1998“Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change.”Academy of Management Journal, 41: 621–643.
40.
LevittB.MarchJ. G.: 1988“Organizational learning.”Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.
41.
LorschJ. W.MaclverE.: 1989Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42.
MaharM.: 1990“Wheel of misfortune: Was Merv Griffin's bid for Resorts just a bad gamble?”Barron's, 70(39): 10–48.
43.
MarchJ. G.SproullL.TamuzM.: 1991“Learning from samples of one or fewer.”Organization Science, 2: 1–13.
44.
MarchJ. G.SuttonR. I.: 1997“Organizational performance as a dependent variable.”Organization Science, 8: 698–706.
45.
MariolisP.JonesM. H.: 1982“Centrality in corporate interlock networks: Reliability and stability.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 571–584.
MenonT.PfefferJ.SuttonR. I.: 2000“The valuation of internal versus external knowledge: Why managers sometimes prefer the knowledge possessed by outsiders over the knowledge possessed by insiders.” Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
48.
MillJ. S.: 1893A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. New York: Harper & Brothers.
49.
MinerA. S.AndersonP.: 1999“Industry and population-level learning: Organizational, interorganizational, and collective learning processes.” In MinerA. S.AndersonP. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 16: 1–30. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
50.
MinerA. S.HaunschildP. R.: 1995“Population level learning.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 17: 115–166. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51.
MinerA. S.HolzingerI.KimJ.HaunschildP. R.: 1999“Fruits of failure: Organizational failure and population level learning.” In MinerA. S.AndersonP. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 16: 187–220. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
52.
MinerA. S.RaghavanS.: 1999“Interorganizational imitation: A hidden engine of selection.” In BaumJ.McKelveyW. (eds.), Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell: 35–62. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
MizruchiM. S.: 1992The Structure of Corporate Political Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
MorrisM. W.MooreP. C.: 2000“The lessons we (don't) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 737–765.
55.
NathanK. S.O'KeefeT. B.: 1989“The rise in takeover premiums: An exploratory study.”Journal of Financial Economics, 23: 101–119.
56.
NisbettR. E.RossL.: 1980Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57.
PalmerD.JenningsP. DevereauxZhouX.: 1993“Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U. S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 100–131.
58.
PalmerD.BarberB. M.ZhouX.SoysalY.: 1995“The friendly and the predatory acquisition of large U.S. corporations in the 1960s: The other contested terrain.”American Sociological Review, 60: 469–499.
59.
PfefferJ.: 1983“Organizational demography.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 5: 299–357. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
60.
PodolnyJ. M.: 1993“A status-based model of market competition.”American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872.
61.
PodolnyJ. M.BaronJ. N.: 1997“Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace.”American Sociological Review, 62: 673–693.
62.
PodolnyJ. M.StuartT. E.HannanM. T.: 1996“Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991.”American Journal of Sociology, 102: 659–689.
63.
PowellW. W.: 1990“Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
64.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.: 1991“Introduction.” In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
PowellW. W.KoputK. W.Smith-DoerrL.: 1996“Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.
66.
RollR.: 1986“The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers.”Journal of Business, 59: 197–218.
67.
RogersE.: 1995Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed.New York: Free Press.
68.
SimonH. A.: 1955“A behavioral model of rational choice.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69: 99–118.
69.
Si rowerM. L.: 1994“Acquisition behavior, strategic resource commitments and the acquisition game: A new perspective on performance and risk in acquiring firms.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
70.
SitkinS.: 1992“Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 14: 231–266. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
71.
SluskyA. R.CavesR. E.: 1991“Synergy, agency and the determinants of premia paid in mergers.”Journal of Industrial Economics, 39: 277–296.
72.
StasserG.TitusW.: 1987“Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 81–93.
73.
SternG.: 1995“Chrysler directors’ takeover experience could be a factor in Kerkorian's favor.”Wall Street Journal, April 17: 3.
74.
StuartT.PodolnyJ.: 1997“Positional causes and consequences of strategic alliances in the semiconductor industry.” Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
75.
TrachtenbergJ. A.MeinbardisR.HillerD. B.: 1990“Buy-out bomb: An extra $500 million paid for Federated got Campeau into trouble.”Wall Street Journal, January 11:1.
76.
UseemM.: 1984The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press.
77.
UzziB.: 1996“The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect.”American Sociological Review, 61: 674–698.
78.
UzziB.: 1998“Access and control benefits through embedded ties and network complementarity: The case of midmarket firms and banks.” Working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.
79.
VaraiyaN. P.: 1988“Determinants of premiums in acquisition transactions.”Managerial and Decision Economics, 8: 175–184.
80.
WassermanS.FaustK.: 1994Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
WassersteinB.: 1998Big Deal: The Battle for Control of America's Leading Corporations. New York: Warner Books.
82.
WilliamsK. Y.O'ReillyC. A.: 1998“Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research.” In StawB. M.SuttonR. I. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77–140. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
83.
ZukinS.DiMaggioP. J. (eds.): 1990Introduction to Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
