This article provides a commentary on issues regarding the use of response to intervention (RTI) with English language learners (ELLs). The commentary draws on current literature on reading instruction, ELLs, RTI, and students with learning disabilities and highlights key points from the articles in this special issue. The discussion includes future directions for research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerS. K.GerstenR.HaagerD.DingleM. (2006). Teaching practice and the reading growth of first-grade English learners: Validation of an observation instrument. Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 199–220.
2.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
ChiappeP.SiegelL. S. (2006). A longitudinal study of reading development of Canadian children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 135–152.
4.
ChiappeP.SiegelL. S.Wade-WoolleyL. (2002). Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 369–400.
5.
DentonC.VaughnS.FletcherJ. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 201–211
6.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2006). The role of assessment in the three-tier approach to reading instruction. In HaagerD.KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 29–42). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
8.
GerstenR. (2006). Introduction: Scientific research on English learners. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 133–134.
9.
GerstenR.BakerS. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66, 454–470.
10.
GerstenR.BakerS. K.HaagerD.GravesA. (2005). Exploring the role of teacher quality in predicting reading outcomes for first-grade English learners: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 197–206.
11.
GravesA.GerstenR.HaagerD. (2004). Literacy instruction in multiple-language first-grade classrooms: Linking student outcomes to observed instructional practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19, 262–272.
12.
GravesA.Plasencia-PeinadoJ.DenoS.JohnsonJ. (2005). Formatively evaluating the reading progress of first-grade English learners in multiple-language classrooms. Remedial & Special Education, 26(4), 215–225
13.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467–547). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
HaagerD.GerstenR.BakerS.GravesA. (2003). The English-Language Learner Classroom Observation Instrument: Observations of beginning reading Iinstruction in urban schools. In VaughnS. R.BriggsK. L. (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observing teaching and learning (pp. 111–144). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
15.
KavaleK.FornessS. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 239–256
16.
KeoghB. K. (1987). Learning disabilities: In defense of a construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 3, 4–9.
17.
KlingnerJ. K.SorrellsA. M.BarreraM. T. (2007). Considerations when implementing response to intervention with culturally and linguistically diverse students. In HaagerD.KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 223–244). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
18.
McCardleP.Mele-McCarthyJ.LeosK. (2005). English language learners and learning disabilities: Research agenda and implications for practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(1), 68–78.
19.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Issues in learning disabilities: Assessment and diagnosis. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.ncld.org/content/view/455/480/
20.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1991, January). Learning disabilities: Issues on definition. Asha, 33 (Suppl. 5), 18–20.
21.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1998). Operationalizing the NJCLD definition of learning disabilities for ongoing assessment in schools. Asha, 40 (Suppl. 18), 258a–258g.
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The nation's report card: 12th-grade reading and mathematics 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
OhD.HaagerD.WindmuellerM. P. (in press). A longitudinal study predicting reading success for English language learners from kindergarten to grade one. Multiple Voices.
24.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
25.
SloaneF. (2005). The scaling of reading interventions: Building multilevel insight. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(3), 361–366.
26.
SnowC. (2006). Cross-cutting themes and future research directions. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners (pp. 631–651). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
SpeeceD. L.WalkerC. Y. (2007). What are the issues in response to intervention research? In HaagerD.KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 287–301). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
28.
VaughnS.FuchsL. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137–146.
29.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K. (2007). Overview of the three-tier model of reading intervention. In HaagerD.KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
VaughnS.MathesP.Linan-ThompsonS.FrancisD. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(1), 58–67.
31.
VaughnS.MathesP.Linan-ThompsonS.CirinoP.CarlsonC.Pollard-DurodolaS.Cardenas-HaganE.FrancisD. (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 153–180.
32.
WileyH.DenoS. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial & Special Education, 26(4), 207–214
33.
WindmuellerM. P. (2004). Early reading predictors of literacy achievement for English learners: A longitudinal study from first through third grade (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 2543.
