This paper investigates how the interorganizational networks of young companies affect their ability to acquire the resources necessary for survival and growth. We propose that, faced with great uncertainty about the quality of young companies, third parties rely on the prominence of the affiliates of those companies to make judgments about their quality and that young companies “endorsed” by prominent exchange partners will perform better than otherwise comparable ventures that lack prominent associates. Results of an empirical examination of the rate of initial public offering (IPO) and the market capitalization at IPO of the members of a large sample of venture-capital-backed biotechnology firms show that privately held biotech firms with prominent strategic alliance partners and organizational equity investors go to IPO faster and earn greater valuations at IPO than firms that lack such connections. We also empirically demonstrate that much of the benefit of having prominent affiliates stems from the transfer of status that is an inherent byproduct of interorganizational associations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertM. B.AveryD.NarinF.McAllisterP.1991“Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents.”Research Policy, 20: 251–259.
2.
AldrichHowardAusterEllen R.1986“Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 165–198. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
AldrichHoward E.FiolC. Marlene1993“Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation.”Academy of Management Review, 19: 645–670.
4.
BarleyStephen R.FreemanJohnHybelsRalph C.1992“Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology.” In NohriaNitinEcclesRobert (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action: 311–347. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
BaumJoel A. C.OliverChristine1991“Institutional linkages and organizational mortality.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 187–218.
6.
1992“Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations.”American Sociological Review, 57: 540–559.
7.
BeattyRandolphRitterJay1986“Investment banking, reputation and the underpricing of initial public offerings.”Journal of Financial Economics, 15: 213–232.
8.
BlauPeter M.1964Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
9.
BurrillStevenG.LeeKenneth B.Jr.1993Biotech, 93: Accelerating Commercialization. San Francisco: Ernst & Young.
10.
BurtRonald S.1987“Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence.”American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1287–1335.
11.
1992Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BurtonDianeSorensenJesperBeckmanChristine1999“Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation.” Working paper, Harvard Business School.
13.
BygraveWilliam D.TimmonsJeffry A.1992Venture Capital at the Crossroads. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
CahillScottCaligarisRichardWilliamsDavid1992“Have pharmaceutical companies missed the boat on biotechnology?”Medical Marketing and Media, January: 28–38.
15.
CarterRichardManasterSteven1990“Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation.”Journal of Finance, 45: 1045–1067.
16.
CohenWesley M.LevinthalDaniel A.1990“Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.
17.
CoombsJ.1986The Biotechnology Directory: 1986. New York: Stockton Press.
18.
CoombsJ.AlstonY. R.1989The Biotechnology Directory: 1989. New York: Stockton Press.
19.
DavisGerald S.1991“Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583–613.
20.
DibnerMark D.1988Biotechnology Guide: U.S.A. New York: Stockton Press.
21.
1991Biotechnology Guide: U.S.A. New York: Stockton Press.
22.
FreemanJohn1997“Venture capital as an economy of time.” Unpublished manuscript, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
23.
FreemanJohnCarrollGlenn R.HannanMichael T.1983“The liability of newness and age dependence in organizational death rates.”American Sociological Review, 48: 692–710.
24.
GompersPaul A.1995“Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital.”Journal of Finance, 50: 1461–1489.
25.
GoodeWilliam J.1978The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Social Control System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
GranovetterMark S.1973“The strength of weak ties.”American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380.
27.
HannanMichael T.CarrollGlenn R.1992Dynamics of Organizational Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn1984“Structural inertia and organizational change.”American Journal of Sociology, 49: 149–164.
29.
HeckmanJames J.1976“The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.”Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5: 475–492.
KenneyMartin1986Bio-technology: The University-Industrial Complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
KogutBruceZanderUdo1996“What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning.”Organization Science, 7: 502–518.
33.
KnokeDavidBurtRonald S.1983“Prominence.” In BurtRonald S.MinorMichael J. (eds.), Applied Network Analysis: 195–222. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
LatourBruno1987Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
LeeLung-Fei1983“Generalized econometric models with selectivity.”Econometrica, 51: 507–512.
36.
LernerJoshua1994“Venture capitalists and the decision to go public.”Journal of Financial Economics, 35: 293–316.
37.
LevinthalDaniel A.1991“Organizational adaptation, environmental selection, and random walks.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 397–420.
38.
LinNanEnselWalter M.VaughnJohn C.1981“Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment.”American Sociological Review, 46: 393–405.
39.
MarsdenPeter V.1983“Restricted access in networks and models of power.”American Journal of Sociology, 88: 686–717.
40.
MegginsonWilliam L.WeissKathleen A.1991“Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings.”Journal of Finance, 46: 879–903.
41.
MertonRobert C.1973“The Matthew Effect in science.” (First published in 1968.) In StorerNorman W. (ed.), The Sociology of Science: 439–459. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
PodolnyJoel M.1993“A status-based model of market competition.”American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872.
43.
1994“Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458–483.
44.
PodolnyJoel M.PhillipsDamon J.1996“The dynamics of organizational status.”Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 453–471.
45.
PodolnyJoel M.StuartToby E.1995“A role-based ecology of technological change.”American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1224–1260.
46.
PowellWalter W.KoputKenneth W.Smith-DoerrLaurel1996“Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.
47.
RaoHayagreeva1994“The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimization, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912.”Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29–44.
48.
RitterJay R.1984“The ‘hot issue” market of 1980.”Journal of Business, 57: 215–240.
SorensenJesperStuartToby E.1999“Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation.” Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
51.
SpenceMichaelA.1974Market Signaling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
StinchcombeArthur L.1965“Social structure and organizations.” In MarchJames G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations: 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.
53.
StuartToby E.1998“Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668–698.
54.
TrajtenbergManuel1990“A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of information.”Rand Journal of Economics, 21: 172–187.
TushmanMichael L.AndersonPhilip1986“Technological discontinuities and organizational environments.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439–465.
57.
TushmanMichael L.RosenkopfLori1992“Organizational determinants of technological change: Toward a sociology of technological evolution.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 14: 311–347. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
58.
WerthBarry1994The Billion Dollar Molecule. New York: Simon & Schuster.
59.
WhiteHarrison1985“Agency as control.” In PrattJ.ZeckhauserR. (eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business: 187–212. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
