The purpose of this descriptive study was to examine the component reading skills of adolescent struggling readers attending urban high schools. Specifically, 11 measures of reading skills were administered to 345 adolescent readers to gain a research-based perspective on the reading skill profile of this population. Participants were assessed in the domains of word level, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. Analysis of the results found that 61% of the struggling adolescent readers had significant deficits in all of the reading components listed above. Subgroups of struggling readers showed similar but more severe patterns. For example, students with learning disabilities scored significantly below the levels of the struggling reader group at large. In contrast, most proficient readers scored high on all measures of reading with above-average component reading skills in word level, vocabulary, and comprehension. The lowest skill area for the proficient reader group was fluency, where they scored at the average level. Implications for policy and instructional programming are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
AllensworthE. M.EastonJ. Q. (2005). The On-Track Indicator as a predictor of high school graduation. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
4.
BermanI.BiancarosaG. (2005). Reading to achieve: A governor's guide to adolescent literacy. Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices.
5.
BiancarosaG.SnowC. E. (2004). Reading next — A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
BoudettK. P.CityE. A.MurnaneR. J. (2005). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
8.
BulyM. R.ValenciaS. (2003). Meeting the needs of failing readers: Cautions and considerations for state policy. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
9.
CampbellF. A.PungelloE. P.Miller-JohnsonS.BurchinalM.RameyC. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–242.
10.
CattsH. W.FeyM. E.TomblinJ. B.ZhangX. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1142–1157.
11.
CattsH. W.HoganT. P.AdlofS. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In CattsH. W.KamhiA. G. (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
Council of Great City Schools. (2001). A decade of outcomes in the nation's urban schools 1990–1999: A report on urban student achievement and course taking. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
CurtisM. B. (2002). Adolescent literacy: A synthesis of research. Boston: Lesley College, The Center for Special Education.
15.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
16.
EhriL. C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexics. In BlachmanB. A. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 163–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
FriedmanT. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
18.
Garcia-ReidP.ReidR. J.PetersonN. A. (2005). School engagement among Latino youth in an urban middle school context: Valuing the role of social support. Education and Urban Society, 37, 257–275.
19.
GleasonP. M.CainG. G. (1997). Earnings of black and white youth and their relation to poverty (discussion Paper No. 1136-97). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty.
20.
HarmM. W.SeidenbergM. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
21.
HockM. F.DeshlerD. D. (2003). Adolescent literacy: Ensuring that no child is left behind. Principal Leadership, 13(4), 55–61.
22.
JarrettR. L. (1997). Bringing families back in: Neighborhoods' effects on child development. In Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J.AberJ. L. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Vol. 2. Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (pp. 48–64). New York: Russell Sage Foundation
23.
KamilM. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
24.
Kansas State Department of Education. (2005). Report card 2004–2005. Retrieved February 12, 2007, from http://onlineksde.org/rcard/.
25.
Kansas State Department of Education. (2008). Kansas special education process handbook. Retrieved August 9, 2008, from http://online.ksde.org/rcard/.
26.
KintschE. (2005). Comprehension theory as a guide for the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 51–64.
27.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KlineT. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
LeeC. L.SpencerM. B.HarpalaniV. (2003). Every shut eye ain't sleep: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 6–13.
31.
LemkeM.SenA.JohnstonJ. S.PahlkeE.WilliamsT.KastbergD.JocelynL. (2005). Characteristics of U.S. 15-year-old low achievers in an international context: Findings from PISA 2000 (NCES 2006-010). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, (2), 309–337.
33.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2003). Children and youth in neighborhood contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 27–31.
34.
LeventhalT.GraberG. A.Brooks-GunnJ. (2001). Adolescent transitions to young adulthood: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences of adolescent employment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(3), 297–323.
35.
LevyF.MurnaneR. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
LyonG. R.AlexanderD.YaffeeS. (1997). Progress and promise in research in learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 1–6.
37.
McCardleP.ChhabraV. (2004). The voice of evidence in reading research. New York: Brookes.
38.
McWayneC. M.FantuzzoJ. W.McDermottP. A. (2004). Preschool competency in context: An investigation of the unique contribution of child competencies to early academic success. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 633–645.
39.
NashJ. K.BowenG. L. (1999). Perceived crime and informal social control in the neighborhood as a context for adolescent behavior: A risk and resilience perspective. Social Work Research, 23, 171–186.
40.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2004). The nation's report card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
44.
NewmanK. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city. New York: Knopf & the Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
PhelpsS. (2005). Ten years of research on adolescent literacy, 1999–2004: A review. Chicago: Learning Point Associates.
46.
RuryJ. L. (2005). Urban education in the United States: A historical reader. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
47.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997, August 15). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
48.
ShareD. L.StanovichK. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: A model of acquisition and individual differences. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 35, 1–57.
49.
SnowC. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
50.
StanovichK. E. (1988). Children reading and the development of phonological awareness. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
51.
ThurlowM. L.SinclairM. F.JohnsonD. R. (2002). Students with disabilities who drop out of school: Implications for policy and practice. Issue Brief, 2(2), 1–7, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Secondary Education and Transition.
52.
TorgesenJ.K.HoskynM. (Eds.). (1999). Assessment and instruction for phonemic awareness and word recognition skills. Needham Heights, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.AlexanderA. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In WolfM. (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 334–355). Parkton, MD: York Press.
54.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Lake Oswego, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
55.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing & reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
56.
United States Census Bureau. (2002). 2000 Census Bureau of population and housing, summary population and housing characteristics. Washington, DC: Author.
57.
U.S. Congress. (2001). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107–110, 107th Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58.
WentzelK. R. (1999). Socio-emotional processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76–97.
