BoeE.BobbittS.A.CookL.H. (1997). Whether dids't thou go? Retention, reassignmnet, migration, and attrition of special and general education teachers in national perspective. Journal of Special Education, 30 (4), 371–389.
2.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. (2002). Identification of learning disabilities. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
ColesG. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at learning disabilities. New York: Pantheon.
4.
CubanL. (1996). Myths about changing schools and the case of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 75–82.
5.
DorisJ.L. (1993). Defining learning disabilities: A history of the search for consensus. In LyonG.R.GrayD.B.KavanaghJ.F.KrasnegorN.A. (Ed.),Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 97–115). Baltimore: Brookes.)
FletcherJ.M.ShaywitzS.W.ShankweilerD.P.KatzL.LibermanI.Y.FowlerA.FrancisD.J.StuebingK.K.ShaywitzB.A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1–18.
8.
FoormanB.R.FrancisD.J.FletcherJ.M. (1995, March). Growth of phonological processing skill in beginning reading: The lag versus deficit model revisited. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.
9.
FrancisD.J.ShaywitzS.E.StuebingK.K.ShaywitzB.A.FletcherJ.M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.
10.
FrankenbergerW.FronzaglioK. (1991). A review of states' criteria for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495–500.
11.
FuchsD.FuchsL.S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 126–137.
12.
FuchsD.FuchsL.S.MathesP.G.LipseyM.L.RobertsP.H. (2002). Is “learning disabilities” just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 737–762). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.)
13.
GerstenR.DiminoJ. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 120–130.
14.
GerstenR.MorvantM.BrengelmanS. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62 (1), 52–66.
15.
GerstenR.VaughnS.DeshlerD.SchillerE. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466–476.
16.
GottliebJ.AlterM.GottliebB.WishnerJ. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. Journal of Special Education, 27, 453–465.
17.
GrimesJ. (2002). Responsiveness to interventions: The next step in special education identification, service, and exiting decision making. Revision of paper written for the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, and presented at OSEP's LD Summit conference, Washington, DC.
18.
HallahanD.P.MercerC.D. (2001). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
19.
HanushekE.A.KainJ.F.RivkinS.G. (2001, March). Inferring program effects for specialized populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities? Unpublished manuscript.
20.
IkedaM.GustafsonJ.K. (2002). Heartland AEA 11's problem solving process: Impact on issues related to special education(Research Report No. 2002–01). Available from the authors at Heartland Area Education Agency 11, 6500 Corporate Dr., Johnston, IA 50131.
21.
JenkinsJ.R.O'ConnorR.E. (2001, August). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. Paper presented at the LD Initiative Conference sponsored by the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
22.
KavaleK.A. (2001, August). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the LD Initiative Conference sponsored by the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
LyonG.R. (1987). Severe discrepancy: Theoretical, psychometric, developmental, and educational issues. Learning Disabilities Research, 3 (1), 10–11.
25.
LyonG.R.FletcherJ.M.ShaywitzS.E.ShaywitzB.A.WoodF.B.SchulteA.OlsonR. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In FinnC.E.Jr.RotherhamA.J.HokansonC.R.Jr. (Eds.)., Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259–287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute.)
26.
MacMillanD.L.GreshamF.M.BocianK.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314–326.
27.
MacMillanD.L.GreshamF.M.SipersteinG.N.BocianK.M. (1996). The labyrinth of I.D.E.A.: School decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 161–174.
28.
MaloufD.B.SchillerE.P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414–424.
29.
MercerC.D.JordanL.AllsoppD.H.MercerA.R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217–232.
30.
MercerC.D.King-SearsP.MercerA.R. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 141–152.
31.
PugachM. (1988). Special education categories as constraints on the reform of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (3), 52–59.
32.
ReynoldsM.C. (1991). Classification and labeling. In LloydJ.W.ReppA.C.SinghN.N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 29–41). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.)
33.
ReynoldsM.C.WangM.C.WalbergH.J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
34.
ShepardL.SmithM.L. (1983). An evaluation of the identification of learning disabled students in Colorado. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 115–127.
35.
SkrticT. (1991). Behind special education. Denver, CO: Love.
36.
SleeterC.E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46–54.
37.
StanovichK.E.SiegelL.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
38.
ViaderoD. (1991, June 12). States turn to special education programs for budget cuts. Education Week, p. 16.
39.
WangM.C.ReynoldsM.C.WalbergH.J. (1994/1995). Serving students at the margins. Educational Leadership, 52, 12–17.
40.
WillsonV.L. (1987). Statistical and psychometric issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3 (1), 24–28.
41.
WiseB.W.SnyderL. (2001, August). Clinical judgments in identifying and teaching children with language-based reading difficulties. Unpublished paper submitted to the LD Summit, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
42.
YsseldykeJ.E.AlgozzineB.EppsS. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practices in classifying students as learning disabled. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166.
43.
YsseldykeJ.E.AlgozzineB.ShinnM.R.McGueM. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.