AshtonT. (2005). Students with learning disabilities using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. In EdyburnD.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 229–238). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.)
3.
BatshawM.L.PerretY.M. (1992). Children with disabilities: A medical primer. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
BauschM.E. (1999). A comparison of standard computer keyboard input to alternate keyboard input when using the constant time delay response prompting procedure during computerized mathematics instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
5.
BlackhurstA.E. (1965). Technology in special education - some implications. Exceptional Children, 31, 449–456.
6.
BlackhurstA.E. (1967). Tachistoscopic training as a supplement to reading instruction for educable mentally retarded children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 2, 121–125.
7.
BlackhurstA.E. (1997). Perspectives on technology in special education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 29 (5), 41–48.
8.
BlackhurstA.E. (2001). Designing technology professional development programs. In WoodwardA.CubanL. (Eds.), Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 138–186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.)
9.
BlackhurstA.E. (2002). Case study on the integration of instruction about technology into a special education teacher preparation program. Available online at http://natri.uky.edu/resources/reports/caseihe.html
10.
BlackhurstA.E. (2005). Historical perspectives about technology applications for people with disabilities. In EdyburnD.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 1–27). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.)
11.
BlackhurstA.E.EdyburnD.L. (2000). A brief history of special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 2 (1), 21–35.
12.
BlackhurstA.E.HofmeisterA.M. (1980). Technology in special education. In MannL.SabatinoD. (Eds.), Fourth review of special education (pp. 199–228). New York: Grune and Stratton.)
13.
BlackhurstA.E.LahmE.A.(in press). Foundations of technology and exceptionality. In LindseyJ. (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (4th ed.) Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.)
14.
BowserG.ReedP.R. (1995). Education TECH points for assistive technology planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12 (4), 325–338
15.
CarnineD.W.SilbertJ.KameenuiE.J. (1990). Direct instruction in reading (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
16.
ChambersA.C. (1997). Has technology been considered? A guide for IEP teams. Albuquerque, NM: The Council of Administrators of Special Education, Inc.
17.
Commission on Instructional Technology. (1970). To improve learning: A report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
CookA.M.HusseyS.M. (2002). Assistive technology: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
19.
DeshlerD.D.SchumakerJ.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52 (6), 583–590.
EdyburnD.L. (2005). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: From consideration to outcome measurement. In EdyburnD.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 239–269). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.)
LewisR.B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
24.
LewisR.B. (2005). Classroom technology for students with learning disabilities. In EdyburnD.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 325–334). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.)
MajsterekD.EdyburnD.L. (Eds.). (1993). Special education technology applications for individuals with learning disabilities [Special issue]. LD Forum, 19(1).
27.
OkoloC.M. (2000). Technology for individuals with mild disabilities. In LindseyJ. (Ed.),Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 243–301). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.)
28.
RoseD.MeyerA. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15 (1), 67–70.
29.
WarfieldG.J. (Ed.). (1968). Special feature issue: The special education IMC/RMC network.Exceptional Children, 35, 315–317.
WoleryM.AultM.J.DoyleP.M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting procedures. White Plains, NY: Longman.
32.
WoleryM.BaileyD.B.SugaiG.M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
ZabalaJ. (1995). The SETT framework: Critical issues to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381 962)