American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
ArtilesA.J.RuedaR.SalazarJ.J.HigaderaI. (2002). English language learner representation in special education in California urban school districts. In LosenD.J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 117–137). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
3.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD.P. (2002). Identification of learning disabilities. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.
ChandlerJ.PlatkosJ. (1969). Spanish speaking pupils classified as EMR. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
6.
DarsieM.L. (1926). The mental capacity of American-born Japanese children. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 3, 1–89.
7.
Diana v California State Board of Education. No. C-70–37, United States District Court of Northern California. (1970).
8.
DonovanM.S.CrossC.T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority children in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.)
9.
DurgunogluA.Y. (1998). Acquiring literacy in English and Spanish in the United States. In A. Durgunoglu & L. Verhoeven, Literacy development in a multilingual context (pp. 135–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
FigueroaR.A. (2002). Toward a new model of assessment. In ArtilesA.J.OrtizA.A. (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment and instruction (pp. 51–64). McHenry, IL: Delta Systems.)
11.
FigueroaR.A.HernandezS. (2000). Our nation on the fault line: Hispanic American education: Testing Hispanic students in the United States: Technical and policy issues. Washington, DC: President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans.
12.
FinnJ.D. (1982). Patterns in special education placement as revealed by OCR surveys. In HellerK.A.HoltzmanW.H.MessickS. (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 322–381). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.)
13.
FriendM. (2005). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Boston; Pearson.
14.
GandaraP. (1999). Review of research on the instruction of limited English proficient students. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara, Linguistic Minority Research Institute, University of California.
15.
GandaraP.RumbergerR.W.Maxwell-JollyJ.CallahanR. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11. Retrieved March 21, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/.
16.
GeneseeF.GandaraP. (1999). Bilingual education programs: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 665–685.
17.
GrissomJ. (2004). Reclassification of English learners. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12, 36.
18.
HellerK.A.HoltzmanW.H.MessickS. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
Hung-HsiaH. (1929). The mentality of the Chinese and Japanese. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13, 9–31.
20.
JensenA.R. (1961). Learning abilities in Mexican American and Anglo American children. California Journal of Educational Research, 12, 147–159.
21.
JensenA.R.FigueroaR.A. (1975). Forward and backward digit span interaction with race and IQ: Predictions from Jensen's hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 882–893.
22.
JensenA.R.InouyeA.R. (1980). Level I and Level II abilities in Asian, White, and Black children. Intelligence, 4, 41–29.
23.
KlingerJ.K.ArtilesA.J.Mendez-BarlettaL. (2004). English language learners and learning disabilities. Paper presented at the research conference English Language Learners Struggling to Learn: Emergent Research on Linguistic Differences and Learning Disabilities, Scottsdale, AZ.
24.
LindholmK.AcianC. (1991). Bilingual proficiency as a bridge to academic achievement: Results from bilingual immersion programs. Journal of Education, 173, 99–113.
25.
LuhC.W.WyT.M. (1931). A comparative study of the intelligence of Chinese children on the Pintner performance and the Binet tests. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 402–408.
26.
MedinaM.EscamillaK. (1992a). English acquisition by fluent and limited-Spanish proficient Mexican Americans in a 3-year maintenance bilingual program. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14, 252–267.
27.
MedinaM.EscamillaK. (1992b). Evaluation of transitional and maintenance bilingual programs. Urban Education, 27, 263–290.
28.
ManuelH.T. (1935). Spanish and English editions of the Stanford-Binet in relation to the abilities of Mexican children (University of Texas Bulletin No. 3532). Austin: University of Texas.
29.
MercerJ.R. (1979). The system of multicultural pluralistic assessment: Technical manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
30.
PortesP.R. (1999). Social psychological factors in the academic achievement of children of immigrants: A cultural historical puzzle. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 489–507.
31.
ReynoldsA. (1933). The education of Spanish-speaking children in five southwestern states (Bulletin No. 11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
32.
SandovalJ. (1998). Critical thinking in test interpretation. In SandovalJ.FrisbyC.L.GeisingerK.F.ScheunemanJ.D.GrenierJ.R. (Eds.), Test interpretation and diversity: Achieving equity in assessment (pp. 31–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.)
33.
ThompsonM.diCerboK.MahoneyK.MacSwanJ. (2002). Exito en California? A validity critique of language program evaluations and analysis of English Learner test scores. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 7.
34.
TuckerJ.A. (1980). Ethnic proportions in classes for the learning disabled: Issues in nonbiased assessment. Journal of Special Education, 14, 93–105.
35.
TurnbullR.TurnbullA.ShankM.SmithS.J. (2004). Exceptional lives: Special education in today's schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
36.
ValdesG.FigueroaR.A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.