The Future of a Mistake: Will Discrepancy Measurement Continue to Make the Learning Disabilities Field a Pseudoscience?

Aaron P.G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461–502.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2004, November). The new IDEA: CEC's summary of significant issues. Arlington, VA: CEC.

Fletcher J.M. (1992). The validity of distinguishing children with language and learning disabilities according to discrepancies with IQ: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 546–548.

Fletcher J.M. Shaywitz S.E. Shankweiler D. Katz L. Liberman I. Stuebing K. Francis D.J. Fowler A. Shaywitz B.A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.

Flowers L. Meyer M. Lovato J. Wood F.B. Felton R.H. (2001). Does third grade discrepancy status predict the course of reading development? Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 49–71.

Gordon M. Lewandowski L. Keiser S. (1999). The LD label for relatively well-functioning students: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485–490.

Hatcher P.J. Hulme C. (1999). Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children's responsiveness to remedial reading instruction: Evidence from a longitudinal intervention study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 130–153.

Hynd G.W. Clinton A. Hiemenz J.R. (1999). The neuropsychological basis of learning disabilities. In Sternberg R.J. Spear-Swerling L. (Eds.), Perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 6079). New York: Westview/HarperCollins.)

Jimenez J. Ortiz M. Rodrigo M. Hernandez-Valle I. Ramirez G. Estevez A. O'Shanahan I. Trabaue M. (2003). Do effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ-achievement discrepancy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 34–47.

Johnson-Laird P.N. (1999). Deductive reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 109–135.

Kelman M. Lester G. (1997). Jumping the queue: An inquiry into the legal treatment of students with learning disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kersting K. (2004, October). Debating learning-disability identification. APA Monitor, 54–55.

Nickerson R.S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.

Olson R.K. (1999). Genes, environment, and reading disabilities. In Sternberg R.J. Spear-Swerling L. (Eds.), Perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 3–21). New York: Westview/ Harper-Collins.)

Olson R.K. (2002). Dyslexia: Nature and nurture. Dyslexia, 8, 143–159.

Olson R.K. Rack J. Conners F. DeFries J. Fulker D. (1991). Genetic etiology of individual differences in reading disability. In Feagans L. Short E. Meltzer L. (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities (pp. 113–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.)

O'Malley K. Francis D.J. Foorman B.R. Fletcher J.M. Swank P.R. (2002). Growth in precursor and reading-related skills: Do low-achieving and IQ-discrepant readers develop differently? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 19–34.

Pennington B.F. Gilger J. Olson R.K. DeFries J.C. (1992). The external validity of age-versus IQ-discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Lessons from a twin study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 562–573.

Share D.L. (1996). Word recognition and spelling processes in specific reading disabled and garden-variety poor readers. Dyslexia, 2, 167–174.

Shaywitz S.E. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf.

Siegel L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–479.

Siegel L.S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618–629.

Stage S.A. Abbott R.D. Jenkins J.R. Berninger V.W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24–33.

Stanovich K.E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In Torgesen J. Wong B. (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp 87–131). New York: Academic Press.)

Stanovich K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.

Stanovich K.E. (1989). Has the learning disabilities field lost its intelligence? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 487–492.

Stanovich K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.

Stanovich K.E. (1993). Dysrationalia: A new specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 501–515.

Stanovich K.E. (1996). Toward a more inclusive definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 2, 154–166.

Stanovich K.E. (1999a). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350–36

Stanovich K.E. (1999b). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.

Stanovich K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.

Stanovich K.E. (2002). Rationality, intelligence, and levels of analysis in cognitive science: Is dysrationalia possible? In Sternberg R.J. (Eds.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 124–158). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.)

Stanovich K.E. (2004). The robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stanovich K.E. Siegel L.S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.

Stevenson J. (1991). Which aspects of processing text mediate genetic effects? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 249–269.

Stevenson J. (1992). Identifying sex differences in reading disability: Lessons from a twin study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 307–326.

Stuebing K. Fletcher J.M. LeDoux J.M. Lyon G.R. Shaywitz S.E. Shaywitz B.A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classification of reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469–518.

Torgesen J.K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In McCardle P. Chhabra V. (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355–382). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.)

Vellutino F.R. Scanlon D.M. Lyon G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238.

Wadsworth S.J. Olson R.K. Pennington B.F. DeFries J.C. (2000). Differential genetic etiology of reading disability as a function of IQ. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 192–199.

Wise B.W. Ring J. Olson R.K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271–304.