This article reviews instructional approaches for students with mild disabilities in the domain of social studies with an emphasis on methods that provide meaningful access to the general education curriculum. Following an overview of reform efforts in history and the special problems that social studies instruction presents for students with learning disabilities (LD), we discuss research on general literacy and learning strategies in the context of social studies instruction. Next, we describe a small body of research that has used domain-specific instructional approaches to teach social studies concepts such as historical understanding and historical reasoning. We end with a call for special education researchers and practitioners to respond to new educational challenges by focusing on important concepts and ways of thinking that are particular to the discipline of social studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshbyM.G.LeeP. (1987). Children's concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In PortalC. (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62–88). London: Falmer Press.
2.
BeanR.M.ZigmondN.HartmanD.K. (1994). Adapted use of social studies textbooks in elementary classrooms: Views of classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 216–226.
3.
BeckI.L.McKeownM.GromollE.W. (1989). Learning from social studies text. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99–153.
4.
BransfordJ.D.BrownA.L.CockingR.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
BrighamF.J.ScruggsT.E.MastropieriM.A. (1995). Elaborative maps for enhanced learning of historical information: Uniting spatial, verbal, and imaginal information. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 440–460.
6.
BrophyJ. (1992). The de facto national curriculum in U.S. elementary social studies: Critique of a representative example. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 401–447.
7.
BosC.S.AndersP.L.FilipD.JaffeL.E. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384–390.
8.
CarnineD.MillerS.BeanR.ZigmondN. (1994). Social studies: Educational tools for diverse learners. School Psychology Review, 23, 428–441.
9.
De La PazS. (2002) Teaching historical understanding and argumentative writing in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Manuscript in preparation.
10.
De La PazS.GrahamS. (1997a). Strategy instruction in planning: Effects on the writing performance and behavior of students with learning difficulties. Exceptional Children, 63, 167–181.
11.
De La PazS.GrahamS. (1997b). The effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203–222.
12.
DeshlerD.D.ShumakerJ.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 63, 167–181.
13.
DunnA.W. (1916). The social studies in secondary education (Bulletin No. 28). Washington, DC: United States Bureau of Education.
14.
DunnR.E. (2000). Constructing world history in the classroom. In StearnsP.N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 121–140). New York: New York University Press.
15.
FerrettiR.P.MacArthurC.A.OkoloC.M. (2001). Teaching for historical understanding in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 59–71.
16.
FerrettiR.P.OkoloC.M. (1996). Authenticity in learning: Multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 450–460.
17.
FosterS.J.YeagerE.A. (1999). “You've got to put together the pieces”: English 12-year-olds encounter and learn from historical evidence. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14, 286–317.
18.
GlaserC.W.RiethH.J.ColburnL.K.PeterJ. (1999). A description of the impact of multimedia anchored instruction on classroom interactions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 27–43.
19.
GrahamS.HarrisK.MacArthurC.A.SchwartzS.S. (1998). Writing instruction. In WongB.Y.L. (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 391–424). New York: Academic Press.
20.
HakimJ. (1993). The history of US. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
HarmonJ.M.KatimsD.S.WhittingtonD. (1999). Helping middle school students learn with social studies texts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 70–75.
22.
HigginsK.BooneR.LovittT.C. (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 402–412.
23.
HortonS.V.LovittT.C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 447–462.
24.
HudsonP. (1996). Using a learning set to increase the test performance of students with learning disabilities in social studies classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 78–85.
25.
HudsonP. (1997). Using teacher-guided practice to help students with learning disabilities acquire and retain social studies content. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 23–32.
26.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L. 105–17, 20 U.S. C. §1400 et seq.
27.
JitendraA.NoletV.GomezO.XinY.P. (1999, April). An analysis of four middle school geometry textbooks: Meeting the needs of students with learning problems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
28.
KinderD.BursuckB. (1992). An evaluation of history textbooks. Journal of Special Education, 25, 472–91.
29.
KinderD.BursuckB. (1993). History strategy instruction: Problem-solution-effect analysis, timeline, and vocabulary instruction. Exceptional Children, 59, 324–335.
30.
LappM.S.GriggW.S.Tay-LimB.S.H. (2002). The nation's report card: U.S. History 2001. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved June 20, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ushistory/
31.
LeeP.AshbyR. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7–14. In StearnsP.N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
32.
LowenthalD. (2000). Dilemmas and delights of learning history. In StearnsP.N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 63–82). New York: New York University Press.
33.
MacArthurC.FerrettiR.P. (1997, April). The effect of explicit goals on the argumentative writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
34.
MacArthurC.FerrettiR.P.OkoloC. M. (2002). On defending controversial viewpoints: Debates of sixth graders about the desirability of early 20th-century American immigration. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 160–172.
35.
MastropieriM.A.ScruggsT.E.WhedonC. (1997). Using mnemonic strategies to teach information about U.S. presidents: A classroom-based investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 13–21.
36.
MoroccoC.C. (2001). Teaching for understanding with students with disabilities: New directions for research on access to the general education curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 5–14.
37.
NashG.B. (2000). The “convergence” paradigm in studying early American history in the schools. In StearnsP.N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 102–120). New York: New York University Press.
38.
NashG.B.CrabtreeC.DunnR.E. (1997). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: A.A. Knopf.
39.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2001). US history framework for the 1994 and 2001 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
National Center for Study of History in the Schools. (1996). National standards for United States history. Los Angeles: UCLA.
41.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
OkoloC.M.FerrettiR.P. (1996). Knowledge acquisition and technology-supported projects in the social studies for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 91–103.
43.
OkoloC.M.FerrettiR.P. (1997). Knowledge acquisition and technology-supported projects in the social studies for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 91–103.
44.
PasseJ.BeattieJ. (1994). Social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities: A progress report. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 227–233.
45.
PattonJ.R.PollowayE.A.CroninM.E. (1987). Social studies instruction for handicapped students: A review of current practices. The Social Studies, 78, 131–135.
46.
PaxtonR.J. (1999). A deafening silence: History textbooks and the students who read them. Review of Educational Research, 69, 315–339.
47.
PressleyM.BrownR.El-DinaryP.B.AfflerbachP. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 215–224.
StanleyW.B. (1985). Recent research in the foundation of social education: 1976–1983. In StanleyW.B. (Ed.), Review of research in social studies education: 1976–1983 (pp. 303–399). Washington, DC: National Council for Social Studies.
50.
StearnsP.N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (2000). Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
51.
SwansonH.L.HoskynM. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277–321.
52.
VanSledrightB.A.KellyC. (1998). Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 239–265.
53.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD.J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114.
54.
Ward-LonerganJ.M.LilesB.Z.AndersonA.M. (1998). Listening comprehension and recall abilities in adolescents with language-learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 1–32.
55.
WileyJ.VossJ.F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311.
56.
WineburgS. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
57.
WongB.Y.L.WongR.PerryN.SawatskyD. (1986). The efficacy of a self-questioning summarization strategy for use by underachievers and learning disabled adolescents in social studies. Learning Disability Focus, 2, 20–35.
