AllingtonR.L.McGill-FranzenA. (1989). School response to reading failure: Chapter 1 and special education students in grades two, four and eight. Elementary School Journal, 89 (5), 529–542.
2.
AndersP.RichardsonV. (1991). Research directions: Staff development that empowers teachers' reflection and enhances instruction. Language Arts, 68 (4), 316–321.
3.
AndersP.L.RichardsonV. (1994a). Teacher as game show host, bookkeeper, or judge? Consequences of the culture of accountability. Teachers College Record, 94 (2), 382–396.
4.
AndersP.RichardsonV. (1994b). Launching a new form of staff development. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 1–22). New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
AppleM.W. (1975). The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict. In PinarW.F. (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 95–119). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon.
6.
BerlakA.BerlakH. (1981). Dilemmas of schooling. New York: Methuen.
7.
BosC.AndersP. (1994). The study of student change. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 181–198). New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
BosC.S.FletcherT.V.(in press). Sociocultural variables in learning disabilities inclusion research: Knowledge gaps and future directions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
9.
ClarkM.C.PetersonP.L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: MacMillan
10.
ConfreyJ. (1987). Mathematics learning and teaching. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Educators' handbook: A research perspective (pp. 3–25). New York: Longman.
11.
CubanL. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1800 to the present). In JacksonP. (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 85–106). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon.
12.
DoyleW. (1990). Classroom knowledge as a foundation for teaching. Teachers College Record, 91 (3), 247–260.
13.
DurkinD. (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14 (4), 482–533.
14.
EvansK. (1996). A closer look at literature discussion groups: The influence of gender on student response and discourse. The New Advocate, 9, 183–196.
15.
EvansK.AndersP.L.AlvermannD.(in press). Are literature discussion groups empowering?Reading Research and Instruction.
16.
FergusonD.L.FergusonP.M.BogdanR.C. (1987). If mainstreaming is the answer, what is the question. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Educators' handbook: A research perspective (pp. 394–419). New York: Longman.
17.
FraatzJ.M.B. (1987). The politics of reading. New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
GehrkeN.J.KnappM.S.SirotnikK.A. (1992). In search of the school curriculum. In GrantG. (Ed.), Review of research in education, 18 (pp. 51–110). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19.
GinsbergH. (1977). Children's arithmetic: How they learn if and how you teach it. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
20.
GuskeyT.R. (1988). Implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69.
21.
HeapJ.L. (1982). Understanding classroom events: A critique of Durkin, with an alternative. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14 (4), 391–411.
22.
LampertM. (1985). How do teachers manage to think?Harvard Educational Review, 55 (2), 177–198.
23.
LampertM. (1989). Choosing and using mathematical tools in classroom discourse. In BrophyJ. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1, pp. pp. 223–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
24.
MasonJ.OsbornJ. (1982). When do children begin “reading to learn”? A survey of classroom reading instruction practices in grades two through five (Technical Report No. 261). Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Center for the Study of Reading.
25.
MojeE.B.ShepardsonD.P. (in press). Social interaction and children's understanding of electric circuits. In GuzettiB.J.HyndC. (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on conceptual change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
MollL.C. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
PetersonP.L.ClarkM.C. (1978). Teachers' reports of their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 417–432.
28.
RichY. (1990). Ideological impediments to instructional innovation: The case of cooperative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6 (1), 81–91.
29.
RichardsonV. (1992). The agenda-setting dilemma in a constructivist staff development process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8 (3), 287–300.
30.
RichardsonV.AndersP. (1994). The study of teacher change. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 159–180). New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
RichardsonV.AndersP.TidwellD.LloydC. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction, American Educational Research Journal, 28 (3), 559–586.
32.
RichardsonV.CasanovaU.PlacierP.GuilfoyleK. (1989). School children at-risk. London: Falmer.
33.
RichardsonV.HamiltonM.L. (1994). The practical argument staff development process. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 109–134). New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
SparksD.Loucks-HorsleyS. (1990). Models of staff development. In HoustonR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 234–250). New York: MacMillan.
36.
TidwellD.MitchellJ. (1994). Current teaching practices in reading comprehension. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case of reading instruction (pp. 43–67). New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
VygotskyL.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
38.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
WellsG.Chang-WellsG.L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.