This study illustrated how youth with learning disabilities (LD) perceive various aspects of their high school program. One hundred and eighty-five students with LD participated in an interview that explored their views of high school. Specifically, they responded to questions about the best and worst parts of school, recommended school, family, or personal changes that would improve their success in school, gave examples of how a teacher had helped them to learn, and offered general recommendations for improving school. The responses provide information on how they, as consumers of services, view their high school program. This information, in turn, offers insight into how educators might better tailor high school interventions to help more youth with LD to complete high school.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakkenT.KorteringL. (1999). The constitutional and statutory obligations of schools toward special education school dropouts. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 360–366.
2.
BartnickW.ParkayF. (1991). A comparative analysis of the “holding power” of general and exceptional education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 17–22.
3.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal post school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
4.
BlackorbyJ.EdgarE.KorteringL. (1991). A third of your youth? The problem of school dropout among mildly handicapped youth. Journal of Special Education, 25, 102–113.
5.
BoundJ.JohnsonG. (1992). Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980's: An evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review, 82, 371–392.
6.
Center for Adult Learning and Educational Credentials. (1999). Who took the GED: GED 1998 statistical reportWashington, DC: American Council on Education, GED Testing Service.
7.
Center for the Future of Children. (1996). The future of children: Executive Summary, 6(1), 1–7. Los Altos, CA: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.
8.
ChaikindS.DanielsonL.C.BravenM.L. (1992). What do we know about the costs of special education? A selected review. Journal of Special Education, 26, 334–370.
9.
ChambersJ.G.ParrishT.B.LiebermanJ.C.WomanJ.M. (1998). What are we spending on special education in the U.S.? CSEF brief. Palo Alto, CA: Center for Special Education Finance.
10.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl. 95), S95–S120.
11.
ColeyR.J. (1997). Dreams deferred: High school dropouts in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
12.
de BettencoutL.SabornieE. (1998). Teaching students with mild disabilities at the secondary level. Upper River, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishing.
13.
EisenmanL.ChamberlinM. (2001). Implementing self-determination activities: Lessons from schools. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 138–147.
14.
FinnJ.RockD. (1997). Academic success among students at risk of school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.
15.
FinnJ. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
16.
HasiziS.B.GordonL.R.RoeC.A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979–1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
17.
HaynesD. (1999). Grading our schools '99: Second annual report to North Carolina parents and taxpayers. Raleigh: NC Alliance for Smart Schools.
18.
HightJ. (1998). Young worker participation in post-school education and training. Monthly Labor Review, 122, 14–21.
19.
Hollingshead, 1949. Elmstown's youth: The impact of social class on adolescents. New York: John Wiley Publishing.
20.
HolsteinJ.A.GubruimJ.F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
KarpinskiM.J.NeubertD.A.GrahamS. (1992). A followalong study of postsecondary outcomes for graduates and dropouts with mild disabilities in a rural setting. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 376–385.
22.
KorteringL.TompkinsJ.BrazielP. (2002). The challenge of school completion among youth with behavior disorders: Another side of the story. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 142–154.
23.
KorteringL.BrazielP. (2001) A look at the expressed career ambitions of youth with LD. Journal of Vocational Special Needs, 23, 24–33.
24.
KorteringL.BrazielP. (1999a). Staying in school: What 9th graders have to say. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 106–113.
25.
KorteringL.BrazielP. (1999b). Dropout prevention: A look at what dropout youth have to say. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 78–83.
26.
KorteringL.BrazielP. (1998). School dropout among rural youth with and without LD. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 61–70.
27.
LankfordH.WyckoffJ. (1995). Where has the money gone? An analysis of school district spending in New York. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 195–218.
28.
McEvoyA.WelkerR. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 130–140.
29.
MithaugD.E.HourichiC.N.FanningP.N. (1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up study. Exceptional Children, 53, 555–561.
30.
NewburgerE.C.CurryA. (1999). Educational attainment in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
31.
OddenA.MonkD.NakibY.PicusL. (1995). The story of the education dollar: No academy awards and no fiscal smoking guns. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 161–168.
32.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
33.
Office of Special Education Programs. (1987). Ninth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
34.
PattonM.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
RossiR.J. (1995). Schools and students at risk. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
SitlingtonP.L.FrankA.R. (1993). Dropouts with learning disabilities: What happens to them as young adults?Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 244–252.
37.
SmithS. (1990). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education — from intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children, 58, 6–14.
38.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
SwaimR.C.BeauvisF. (1997). The effect of school dropout on estimates of adolescent drug use. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 51–61.
40.
United States Census Bureau. (2002). Bureau of Census 2000 report. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
WagnerM. (1991). Dropouts with disabilities: What do we know? What can we do?Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
42.
WehlageG.G.RutterR.A.SmithG.A.LeskoN.FernandezR.R. (1989). Reducing the risk: School dropouts as communities of support. New York: Falmer Press.
43.
United States Census Bureau. (2002). Quickfacts.census.gov.
44.
U.S. Congress and Administration News. (1975). Aid to education of the handicapped approved (pp. 651–656). Washington, DC: Author.
45.
WeymeyerM.L.AgranM.HughesC. (1999). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
46.
ZigmondN.ThorntonH. (1985). Follow-up post secondary age learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 50–55.
