Making Science Accessible to All: Results of a Design Experiment in Inclusive Classrooms

Abstract

Recent science reform documents call for students to develop robust understandings of scientific concepts and reasoning through inquiry-based instruction. The challenge of this goal is increased in heterogeneous inclusive classroom settings with students identified as having learning disabilities and emotional impairments. This article describes a design experiment conducted over two school years in which we investigated the experiences and outcomes for special needs students in guided inquiry science instruction in upper-elementary grade classrooms (n = 4). Phase 1 (′97-′98) of the design experiment utilized qualitative and quantitative data to construct case studies of individual learners with special needs. Patterns across the cases informed the identification of advanced instructional strategies hypothesized to support special needs students relative to language/cognition, print literacy, attention, and social relations challenges. In Phase 2 (′98-′99), we studied learning outcomes from instruction including the advanced strategies (same teachers, topics as Phase 1). Our findings indicate that in Phase 2 (with the advanced strategies) all students demonstrated significant learning gains over Phase 1 and that special needs and low-achieving students in three of four classes showed changes in understanding comparable to those of normally achieving students. We conclude by identifying implications of these findings for the roles of general and special educators.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

J.M.

Zigmond

(1995). Case studies of full inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 109–180.

Blumenfeld

P.C.

Meece

J.L.

(1988). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students' involvement and use of learning strategies in science. Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 235–250.

Brown

A.L.

(1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.

Brown

A.L.

Campione

J.C.

(1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In McGilly

(Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Carlisle

J.F.

Chang

(1996). Evaluation of academic capabilities in science by students with and without learning disabilities and their teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 18–34.

Collins

K.M.

(1999). “Do you think I'm proper?” A case study of the making of educational exclusion, ability, achievement, and identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Cutter

Magnusson

S.J.

Palincsar

A.S.

(work in progress). Reconstructing group work as an intervention to support the learning of identified students in challenging science instruction.

Dalton

Morocco

Tivnan

Mead

(1997). Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban science classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(6), 670–684.

Driver

Guesne

Tiberghien

(1985). Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

10.

Englert

Tarrant

Rozendal

(1993). Educational innovations: Achieving curricular change through collaboration. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(4), 441–473.

11.

Gersten

Baker

(1998). Real world use of scientific concepts: Integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. Exceptional Children, 65(1), 23–35.

12.

Guba

Lincoln

(1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin

N.K.

Lincoln

Y.S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

John-Steiner

Mahn

(1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191–206.

14.

Lemke

(1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

15.

Magnusson

S.J.

Palincsar

A.S.

(1995). Learning environments as a site of science education reform: An illustration using interdisciplinary guided inquiry. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 43–50.

16.

Mastropieri

M.A.

Scruggs

T.E.

(1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62(4), 377–411.

17.

Mcintosh

Vaughn

Schumm

J.S.

Haager

Lee

(1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 249–261.

18.

Merriam

(1998). Qualitative research in case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Miller

(1999). The opportunities and challenges of guided inquiry science experiences for students with special needs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

20.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

21.

Palincsar

A.S.

Magnusson

Marano

Ford

Brown

(1998). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5–19.

22.

Palincsar

A.S.

Collins

Marano

Magnusson

S.J.

(2000). Investigating the engagement and learning of students with learning disabilities in guided inquiry science teaching. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 31, 240–251.

23.

Polkinghorne

(1997). Reporting qualitative research as practice. In Tierney

W.G.

Lincoln

Y.S.

(Eds.), Representation and the text (pp. 135–153). Albany: State University of New York Press.

24.

Rogoff

(1997). Cognition as a collaborative process. In Cognitive, language, and perceptual development ( Siegler

R. S.

Kuhn

, eds.), Vol. 2, Handbook of Child Psychology ( Damon

, ed.). New York: Wiley.

25.

Schwab

(1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In Ford

S.W.

Pugno

(Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6–30). Chicago: Rand McNally.

26.

Scruggs

T.E.

Mastropieri

M.M.

(1994). The construction of scientific knowledge by students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 307–321.

27.

Stake

(1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.

The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In McGilly

(Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 157–201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

29.

Wells

(1995). Language and the inquiry oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 25, 233–269.

30.

White

Frederiksen

(1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.

31.

Woodward

Noell

(1991). Science instruction at the secondary level: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(5), 277–284.