Abstract
Seven- to 13-year-old children of average intelligence who were (a) learning disabled (LD, n=42) and (b) not identified as learning disabled (NLD, n=42) were individually tested in a task that investigated the quality of their logical-mathematical structures of thought. Mathematical knowledge was additionally assessed on the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised (WJTA-R). Students in both groups generated grouping relationships in their solutions; however, children with LD tended to generate solutions suggestive of less coordinated structures of thought than their same-aged peers with NLD. They also performed significantly below same-aged peers on the WJTA-R, although they achieved approximately at age-level expectancy on this task. For both groups, scores on the WJTA-R were inflated relative to the quality of operational thought structures demonstrated on the task investigating the quality of grouping relationships deduced. Diagnostic and remedial implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
