This article provides examples of ways that computer-assisted instruction can help children with learning disabilities (LD) learn to read more effectively. Computer-assisted instruction and practice in reading is fit within an instructional model for LD children that recognizes their special needs for assistance in acquiring accurate and fluent word identification skills. The theory that reading disabilities are phonologically based is discussed as a context for focusing instruction on alphabetic reading skills. Computer programs that provide training in phonological awareness, specific context-free word identification skills, and reading of connected text are described, and preliminary evidence about their instructional effectiveness is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AlexanderA.AndersonH.HeilmanP.C.VoellerK.S.TorgesenJ.K. (1991). Phonological awareness training and remediation of analytic decoding deficits in a group of severe dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 193–206.
3.
AllingtonR.L. (1980). Poor readers don't get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 57, 872–876.
4.
AndersonR.C.HiebertE.H.ScottJ.A.WilkinsonI.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
5.
BarkerT.A.TorgesenJ.K.(in press). An evaluation of computer assisted instruction in phonological awareness with below average readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research.
6.
BeckI.L.RothS.F. (1984a). Hint and Hunt teachers' manual. Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.
BradleyL.BryantP. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
BrownA.L.PalincsarA.S.PurcellL. (1986). Poor reader: Teach, don't label. In NeisserU. (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 105–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313–321.
11.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identify. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805–812.
12.
CosdenM.A.GerberM.M.SemmelD.S.GoldmanS.R.SemmelM.I. (1987). Microcomputer use within micro-educational environments. Exceptional Children, 53, 399–411.
13.
EricksonG.C.FosterK.C.FosterD.F.TorgesenJ.K.PackerS. (1992). DaisyQuest. Scotts Valley, CA: Great Wave Software.
14.
EricksonG.C.FosterK.C.FosterD.F.TorgesenJ.K.PackerS. (1993). Castle Quest. Scotts Valley, CA: Great Wave Software.
15.
FletcherJ.M.FrancisD.RourkeB.P.ShaywitzS.E.ShaywitzB.A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555–561.
16.
FosterK.C.EricksonG.C.FosterD.F.BrinkmanD.TorgesenJ.K. (1994). Computer administered instruction in phonological awareness: Evaluation of the DaisyQuest program. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 126–137.
17.
FoxB.RouthD.K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: revised. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 1059–1064.
18.
FredericksenJ.R.WarrenB.M.RoseberyA.S. (1985). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 1. Perceptual units training. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 91–130.
19.
FrithU. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In PattersonK.MarshallJ.ColtheartM. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.
20.
HammillD.D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84.
21.
JonesK.TorgesenJ.K.SextonM.A. (1987). Using computer-guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint & Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122–128.
22.
LesgoldA.M.ResnickL.B. (1982). How reading difficulties develop: perspectives from a longitudinal study. In DasJ.P.MulcahyR.F.WallA.E. (Eds.), Theory and research in learning disabilities (pp. 155–188). New York: Plenum Press.
23.
LewkowiczM.K. (1980). Phonemic awareness training: What to teach and how to teach it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 686–700.
24.
LibermanI.Y.LibermanA.M. (1990). Whole language vs. code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 51–76.
25.
LibermanI.Y.ShankweilerD.LibermanA.M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In ShankweilerD.LibermanI.Y. (Eds.), Phonolgy and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
LieA. (1991). Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in first-grade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 234–250.
27.
LundbergI.FrostJ.PetersonO. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in pre-school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
28.
LyonG.R. (1985). Identification and remediation of learning disability subtypes: Preliminary findings. Learning Disabilities Focus, 1, 21–35.
29.
MorrisonF.J. (1987). The nature of reading disability: Toward an integrative framework. In CeciS. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 33–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
OlsonR.K. (1992). Measurement of phonological, orthographic, and word recognition skills. Paper presented the NICHD sponsored conference on Measurement of Learning Disabilities, Bethesda, MD.
31.
OlsonR.WiseB. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 107–144.
32.
PenningtonB.F.GilgerJ.W.OlsonR.K.DeFriesJ.C. (1992). The external validity of age versus IQ-discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Lessons from a twin study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 562–573.
33.
PerfettiC.A.BeckI.BellL.HughesC. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.
34.
RackJ.P.SnowlingM.J.OlsonR.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–53.
35.
RaynerK.RollatsekA. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
RothS.F.BeckI.L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197–218.
37.
ShankweilerD.LibermanI.Y. (1989). Phonology and reading disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38.
SiegelL.S. (1985). Psycholinguistic aspects of reading disabilities. In SiegelL.MorrisonF. (Eds.), Cognitive development in atypical children (pp. 45–64). New York: Springer-Verlag.
39.
SnowlingM.HulmeC. (1989). A longitudinal case study of developmental phonological dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 379–401.
40.
StanovichK.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
41.
StanovichK.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604.
42.
ThurlowM.L.GradenT.GreeverT.W.YsseldykeJ.E. (1982). Academic responding time for hearing disabled and nonlearning disabled students (Technical report No. 72). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
43.
TorgesenJ.K. (1986). Learning disabilities theory: its current state and future prospects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 399–407.
44.
TorgesenJ.K. (1993). Variations on theory in learning disabilities. In LyonG.R.GrayD.B.KavanaghJ.F.KrasnegorN.A. (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 153–170). Baltimore: Brooks Publishing.
45.
TorgesenJ.K.GreensteinJ.JonesK. (1990). Computer guided reading practice with learning disabled children: Effects on decoding and comprehension skills. Paper presented at National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
46.
TorgesenJ.K.MorganS.DavisC. (1992). The effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364–370.
47.
TorgesenJ.K.WagnerR.K.BalthazarM.DavisC.MorganS.SimmonsK.StageS.ZirpsF. (1989). Developmental and individual differences in performance on phonological synthesis tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 491–505.
48.
TorgesenJ.K.WatersM.D.CohenA.L.TorgesenJ.L. (1988). Improving sight word recognition skills in learning disabled children: An evaluation of three computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 125–133.
49.
VellutinoF.R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437–443.
50.
VellutinoF.R. (1992). Has basic research in reading increased our understanding of developmental reading and how to teach reading?Psychological Science, 70, 81–83.
51.
VellutinoF.R.ScanlonD.M. (1991). The preeminence of phonologically based skills in learning to read. In BradyS.ShankweilerD. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Liberman (pp. 237–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
WagnerR.K. (1986). The nature of phonological processing and its implications for disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 623–629.
53.
WagnerR.K.TorgesenJ.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
54.
WagnerR.K.TorgesenJ.K.LaughonP.SimmonsK.RashotteC.A. (1993). The development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1–20.
55.
WagnerR.K.TorgesenJ.K.RashotteC. (1994). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.
56.
WagnerR.K.TorgesenJ.K.RashotteC. (1993). The efficacy of phonological awareness training for early reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.
57.
WoodwardJ.P.CarnineD.W. (1988). Antecedent knowledge and intelligent computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 131–139.
